Auszug aus EGMR, 22.11.2016 - 4629/07

The relevant domestic law governing the supervisory review procedure in force between 1 February 2003 and 7 January 2008 is summed up in the Court's judgment in the case of Kot v. Russia (no. 20887/03, § 17, 18 January 2007).

Auszug aus EGMR, 22.11.2016 - 4629/07

The Court reiterates its constant approach that in the absence of a fundamental defect in the previous proceedings a party's disagreement with the assessment made by the first-instance and appeal courts is not a circumstance of a substantial and compelling character warranting the quashing of a binding and enforceable judgment and re-opening of the proceedings on the applicant's claim (see Kovalenko and others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 36299/03, 14222/04, 15030/04, 36581/04, 1407/05, 2071/05 and 24618/05, § 16, 8 December 2015).

Auszug aus EGMR, 22.11.2016 - 4629/07

In these circumstances and having regard to the principles developed in its case-law on determination of compensation in similar cases and making its assessment on an equitable basis, as required by Article 41 of the Convention, the Court awards the applicant the sum of EUR 2, 000 in respect of non-pecuniary damagµ (see Goncharova and Others and 68 other "Privileged Pensioners" cases v. Russia, nos. 23113/08 and 68 others, §§ 22-24, 15 October 2009).

Auszug aus EGMR, 22.11.2016 - 4629/07

Having regard to the facts of this case, the submissions of the parties and its findings under Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, the Court considers that it has examined the main legal question, that is the quashing by way of supervisory review of the judgments, raised in the present application and that there is no need to give a separate ruling on this additional complaint (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014, with further references).