Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 22.11.2016 - 49106/09 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,41579) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
VASILYADI v. RUSSIA
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial detention) ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 25.11.2014 - 45520/04
LARIONOVS AND TESS v. LATVIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.11.2016 - 49106/09
45520/04 and 19363/05, § 172, 25 November 2014). - EGMR, 08.06.1995 - 16419/90
YAGCI AND SARGIN v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.11.2016 - 49106/09
Such an approach may suggest that there was no genuine judicial review of the need for detention at each extension of detention (see Yagci and Sargin v. Turkey, 8 June 1995, § 50 et seq., Series A no. 319-A). - EGMR, 12.07.2001 - 33071/96
MALHOUS c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.11.2016 - 49106/09
The Court notes that it normally permits the next of kin to pursue an application, provided he or she has a legitimate interest, where the original applicant died after lodging the application with the Court (see Murray v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 10511/10, § 79, 26 April 2016; Malhous v. the Czech Republic (dec.) [GC], no. 33071/96, ECHR 2000-XII; and Larionovs and Tess v. Latvia (dec.), nos. - EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94
PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.11.2016 - 49106/09
Having regard to the principles set out in Idalov (cited above, § 186); Pedersen and Baadsgaard v. Denmark [GC] (no. 49017/99, § 49, ECHR 2004-XI); and Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II) and all the material before it, the Court notes that the proceedings against the applicant lasted slightly less than two years and five months, which spanned the investigation stage and the examination of the applicant's case by the courts at two levels of jurisdiction.