Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 22.11.2022 - 61827/19 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2022,36456) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SAGER AND OTHERS v. AUSTRIA
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 26.04.2016 - 62649/10
Türkei verurteilt - Aleviten diskriminiert
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.11.2022 - 61827/19
It is true that, where a State has created a status for religious communities entailing specific privileges, it must ensure that religious groups have a fair opportunity to apply for this status and that the criteria established are applied in a non-discriminatory manner (see Izzettin Dogan and Others v. Turkey [GC], no. 62649/10, § 164, 26 April 2016). - EGMR, 29.04.2002 - 2346/02
Vereinbarkeit der strafrechtlichen Verfolgung der Beihilfe zum Selbstmord mit der …
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.11.2022 - 61827/19
The general principles relevant to this question have been summarised in De Wilde (cited above, §§ 50-51) where the Court has held that, although the concept of "religion or belief" in the sense of being protected by Article 9 must be interpreted broadly, that does not mean that all opinions or convictions are to be regarded as such (see Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, § 82, ECHR 2002-III). - EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 43835/11
Gesichtsschleier-Verbot rechtens
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.11.2022 - 61827/19
However, provided this condition is satisfied - and when it has thus been established that Article 9 applies - the State's duty of neutrality and impartiality is incompatible with any power on the State's part to assess the legitimacy of religious beliefs or the ways in which those beliefs are expressed (see S.A.S. v. France [GC], no. 43835/11, § 55, ECHR 2014 and Eweida and Others v. the United Kingdom, nos. 48420/10 and 3 others, § 81, ECHR 2013, with further references).