Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 22.12.2009 - 20882/04 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2009,68077) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
GOROVAYA v. RUSSIA
(englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 08.06.2006 - 75529/01
Verschleppter Prozess - Mann prozessiert seit 16 Jahren um Entschädigung nach …
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.12.2009 - 20882/04
It has been the Court's consistent approach that an applicant cannot be criticised for taking full advantage of resources afforded by national law in the defence of his or her interests, even if it results in a certain increase in the length of the proceedings (see, mutatis mutandis, YaÄ?cı and Sargın v. Turkey, 8 June 1995, § 66, Series A no. 319-A and Sürmeli v. Germany [GC], no. 75529/01, § 131, ECHR 2006-VII).It observes that it is incumbent on the Contracting States to organise their legal systems in such a way that their courts can meet the requirements of Article 6 of the Convention, including the obligation to hear cases within a reasonable time (see Sürmeli v. Germany [GC], no. 75529/01, § 129, 8 June 2006).
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.12.2009 - 20882/04
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII). - EGMR, 08.06.1995 - 16419/90
YAGCI AND SARGIN v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 22.12.2009 - 20882/04
It has been the Court's consistent approach that an applicant cannot be criticised for taking full advantage of resources afforded by national law in the defence of his or her interests, even if it results in a certain increase in the length of the proceedings (see, mutatis mutandis, YaÄ?cı and Sargın v. Turkey, 8 June 1995, § 66, Series A no. 319-A and Sürmeli v. Germany [GC], no. 75529/01, § 131, ECHR 2006-VII).