Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  USMANOV v. RUSSIA

  Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and ...

Wird zitiert von ... (10)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 17.05.2016 - 42461/13

  KARÁCSONY ET AUTRES c. HONGRIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.12.2020 - 43936/18

  42461/13 and 44357/13, § 133, 17 May 2016; and Baka v. Hungary [GC], no. 20261/12, § 161, 23 June 2016).
• EGMR, 12.01.1999 - 31414/96

  KARASSEV v. FINLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.12.2020 - 43936/18

  It seems that this statement was first made in Karassev v. Finland ((dec.), no. 31414/96, ECHR 1999-II).
• EGMR, 29.04.2002 - 2346/02

  Vereinbarkeit der strafrechtlichen Verfolgung der Beihilfe zum Selbstmord mit der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.12.2020 - 43936/18

  The Court's assessment General principles 52. The Court reiterates that the notion of "private life" within the meaning of Article 8 of the Convention is a broad concept which encompasses, inter alia, the right to establish and develop relationships with other human beings (see Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, § 29, Series A no. 251-B), the right to "personal development" (see Bensaid v. the United Kingdom, no. 44599/98, § 47, ECHR 2001-I) and the right to self-determination (see Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, § 61, ECHR 2002-III).

 
• EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 48183/99

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.12.2020 - 43936/18

  In Smirnova v. Russia (nos. 46133/99 and 48183/99, § 97, ECHR 2003-IX (extracts)), the Court found that Russian citizens had to prove their identity unusually often in their everyday life, even when performing such mundane tasks as exchanging currency or buying train tickets, and that the internal passport was also required for more crucial needs, such as finding employment or receiving medical care.
• EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13710/88

  NIEMIETZ v. GERMANY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.12.2020 - 43936/18

  The Court's assessment General principles 52. The Court reiterates that the notion of "private life" within the meaning of Article 8 of the Convention is a broad concept which encompasses, inter alia, the right to establish and develop relationships with other human beings (see Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, § 29, Series A no. 251-B), the right to "personal development" (see Bensaid v. the United Kingdom, no. 44599/98, § 47, ECHR 2001-I) and the right to self-determination (see Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, § 61, ECHR 2002-III).
• EGMR, 28.05.1985 - 9214/80

  ABDULAZIZ, CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.12.2020 - 43936/18

  The Court also reiterates that the States are entitled to control the entry and residence of aliens on their territories (see, among many other authorities, Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, § 67, 28 May 1985, Series A no. 94, and Boujlifa v. France, 21 October 1997, § 42, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-VI).

• EGMR, 14.09.2022 - 24384/19

  Europas IS-Anhänger: Großeltern klagen auf Rückholung

  Elle a par ailleurs précisé l'étendue de son contrôle d'une telle mesure sous l'angle de l'article 8 de la Convention en s'assurant qu'elle ne soit pas arbitraire (K2 c. Royaume-Uni (déc.), no 42387/13, 7 février 2017, Ghoumid et autres, précité, Usmanov c. Russie, no 43936/18, § 54, 22 décembre 2020 et Hashemi et autres c. Azerbaïdjan, nos 1480/16 et 6 autres, § 47, 13 janvier 2022 ; voir, également, sur la possibilité qu'une privation de nationalité puisse constituer une privation arbitraire du droit d'entrer dans son pays garanti par l'article 12 § 4 du PIDCP, § 21 de l'Observation générale no 27, paragraphe 97 ci-dessus).
• EGMR, 14.09.2021 - 13918/06

  SAVENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  18299/03 and 27311/03, ECHR 2011 (extracts), the Tatars, or the Asian minorities leaving in Russia such as Tajikis (see Usmanov v. Russia, no. 43936/18, 22 December 2020) and Kyrgyz, and so on.
• EGMR, 13.01.2022 - 1480/16

  HASHEMI ET AUTRES c. AZERBAÏDJAN

  Par conséquent, elle examinera successivement dans les présentes affaires les conséquences de la mesure litigieuse pour les enfants des requérants et le caractère arbitraire de la mesure en question (Usmanov c. Russie, no 43936/18, § 58, 22 décembre 2020 ; voir aussi Ahmadov, précité, § 43).

 
• EGMR, 07.06.2022 - 61658/19

  SHARIPOV v. RUSSIA

  Turning to the merits of the case, the Court observes that the applicable principles have been summarised in Alpeyeva and Dzhalagoniya v. Russia (nos. 7549/09 and 33330/11, §§ 107-09, 12 June 2018), and Usmanov v. Russia (no. 43936/18, §§ 52-56, 22 December 2020).
• EGMR, 22.03.2022 - 26781/19

  LARABA v. DENMARK

  Deprivation of citizenship 15. The Court notes that the general principles applicable to cases involving deprivation of nationality are well-established in the Court's case-law (see, for example K2 v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 42387/13, §§ 49-50, 7 February 2017, Mansour Said Abdul Salam Mubarak v. Denmark (dec.), no. 74411/16, §§ 62-63, 22 January 2019, Ghoumid and Others v. France, no. 52273/16, §§ 43-44, 25 June 2020, Usmanov v. Russia, no. 43936/18, §§ 52-54, 22 December 2020, and Adam Johansen v. Denmark (dec.), cited above, §§ 44-45 and 52-55).
• EGMR, 01.02.2022 - 27801/19

  JOHANSEN v. DENMARK

  Moreover, it has confirmed that nationality is an element of a person's identity (see, inter alia, Usmanov v. Russia, no. 43936/18, § 53, 22 December 2020 and Ghoumid and Others v. France, no. 52273/16 and 4 others, §§ 43-44, 25 June 2020).
• EGMR, 13.10.2022 - 12456/19

  ZEGGAI c. FRANCE

  La Cour rappelle ainsi que la nationalité est un élément de l'identité des individus (voir, notamment, Ghoumid et autres c. France, nos 52273/16 et 4 autres, § 43, 25 juin 2020, Ramadan c. Malte, no 76136/12, § 85, 21 juin 2016, et Usmanov c. Russie, no 43936/18, § 53, 22 décembre 2020).
• EGMR - 49532/19 (anhängig)

  ZAICOV v. BULGARIA

  If so, did such interference meet the requirements of Article 8 (see, among other authorities, Ramadan v. Malta, no. 76136/12, §§ 84-92, 21 June 2016; Ghoumid and Others v. France, nos. 52273/16 and 4 others, §§ 44-52, 26 June 2020; Usmanov v. Russia, no. 43936/18, §§ 58-70, 22 December 2020)? Was it, as claimed by the applicant, arbitrary, seeing in particular that the applicant was not informed of the factual findings which had led to the revocation, and was not afforded a possibility to challenge it before the domestic courts?.
• EGMR - 28174/23 (anhängig)

  SKALAB c. FRANCE

  La mesure de déchéance de la nationalité française dont a fait l'objet le requérant a-t-elle emporté violation de son droit au respect de sa vie privée et familiale garanti par l'article 8 de la Convention (Ghoumid et autres c. France, nos 52273/16 et 4 autres, 25 juin 2020, Usmanov c. Russie, no 43936/18, 22 décembre 2020 ; voir, également, la résolution no 2263 (2019) de l'Assemblée parlementaire du Conseil de l'Europe adoptée le 25 janvier 2019 et intitulée « La déchéance de nationalité comme mesure de lutte contre le terrorisme: une approche compatible avec les droits de l'homme ? ") ?.
• EGMR, 12.07.2023 - 6041/23

  A.A. v. DENMARK

  The Court notes that the general principles applicable to cases involving deprivation of nationality are well-established in the Court's case-law (see, for example, K2 v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 42387/13, §§ 49-50, 7 February 2017; Mansour Said Abdul Salam Mubarak v. Denmark (dec.), no. 74411/16, §§ 62-63 22 January 2019; Ghoumid and Others v. France, no. 52273/16, §§ 43-44,25 June 2020; Usmanov v. Russia, no. 43936/18, §§ 52-54, 22 December 2020; Adam Johansen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 27801/19, §§ 44-45 and 52-55, 1 February 2022; and Laraba v. Denmark (dec.), no. 26781/19, § 15, 22 March 2022).