Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 23.01.2003 - 51307/99 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2003,38277) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
GEFFRE contre la FRANCE
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
Irrecevable (französisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
GEFFRE v. FRANCE [Extracts]
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (7) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 23.02.1999 - 41400/98
MONFORTE SANCHO, GARCIA MORENO, ROIG ESPERT, ROIG ESPERT ET ICARDO GARCIA contre …
- EGMR, 27.08.1991 - 12750/87
PHILIS v. GREECE
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.01.2003 - 51307/99
It may be subject to limitations, but these must not restrict or reduce the access left to the individual in such a way or to such an extent that the very essence of the right is impaired (see, among other authorities, Philis v. Greece (no. 1), judgment of 27 August 1991, Series A no. 209, pp.
- EGMR, 21.05.2015 - 53723/13
ZAVODNIK v. SLOVENIA
The Court must ascertain whether on the facts of the case a fair balance was struck between, on one hand, the interests of the effective administration of justice and, on the other hand, those of the applicant (see, mutatis mutandis, Geffre v. France (dec.), no 51307/99, CEDH 2003-I). - EGMR, 23.07.2013 - 30633/11
LAY LAY COMPANY LIMITED v. MALTA
Its role in cases such as the present is to determine whether the applicant was able to count on a coherent system that struck a fair balance between the authorities" interests and his own and, in particular, whether he was given a clear, practical and effective opportunity to challenge an administrative act that allegedly constituted a direct interference with his rights (see Geffre v. France (dec.), no. 51307/99, ECHR 2003-I (extracts)). - EGMR, 08.11.2022 - 7567/19
MARINA AUCANADA GROUP S.L. v. SPAIN
Such a system must afford the latter a clear, practical and effective opportunity to challenge administrative acts, as is the case with the publication of a public notice in the Official Gazette (see Geffre v. France (dec.), no. 51307/99, ECHR 2003-I (extracts); and Stichting Landgoed Steenbergen, cited above, § 53) and information given in the local press.
- EGMR, 16.02.2021 - 19732/17
STICHTING LANDGOED STEENBERGEN AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS
The Court must ascertain whether the applicants had a clear, practical and effective opportunity to challenge the administrative act concerned (see Geffre v. France (dec.), no. 51307/99, ECHR 2003-I (extracts), and Lay Lay Company Limited v. Malta, no. 30633/11, § 56, 23 July 2013). - EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 40581/12
PETAR MATAS v. CROATIA
The system allows the owners of protected property to turn to the State if they consider that the burden imposed on them by the protection measure is out of proportion to the aim pursued in the general interest (compare Geffre v. France (dec.), no. 51307/99, ECHR 2003-I (extracts)). - EGMR, 23.05.2017 - 67386/13
DE MORTEMART c. FRANCE
Il rappelle que, dans la décision Geffre c. France (no 51307/99, 23 janvier 2003), la Cour a jugé que la mise en Å“uvre dans cette affaire des mesures prises par la France dans le cadre de l'exécution de l'arrêt De Geouffre de la Pradelle (précité) avaient permis le maintien d'un juste équilibre entre les intérêts en présence et que le requérant n'avait pas subi d'entrave disproportionnée à son droit d'accès à un tribunal. - EGMR, 05.07.2005 - 26941/03
KEFALA c. GRECE
En d'autres termes, il lui appartient de déterminer si, dans le cas d'espèce, un juste équilibre a été ménagé entre les intérêts de l'administration de la justice et ceux de la requérante (voir, mutatis mutandis, Geffre c. France (déc.), no 51307/99, CEDH 2003-I).