Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 23.01.2007 - 1427/03 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,51597) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
PROKOPYSZYN v. POLAND
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 03.11.2005 - 1427/03
- EGMR, 23.01.2007 - 1427/03
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 28.03.1990 - 11968/86
B. ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.01.2007 - 1427/03
The Court reiterates that, in view of the essential link between Article 5 § 3 of the Convention and paragraph 1 (c) of that Article, a person convicted at first instance cannot be regarded as being detained "for the purpose of bringing him before the competent legal authority on reasonable suspicion of having committed an offence", as specified in the latter provision, but is in the position provided for by Article 5 § 1 (a), which authorises deprivation of liberty "after conviction by a competent court" (see, for example, B. v. Austria, judgment of 28 March 1990, Series A no. 175, pp. 14-16, §§ 36-39). - EGMR, 27.06.1968 - 2122/64
Wemhoff ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.01.2007 - 1427/03
Moreover, the fact that the applicant was serving prison sentences in respect of other convictions cannot be considered on the same footing as a detention under Article 5 § 1 (c), with which Article 5 § 3 is solely concerned, as it applies only to persons in custody awaiting their trial (see Wemhoff v. Germany, judgment of 27 June 1968, Series A no. 7, pp. 23-24, § 9).