Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 23.01.2007 - 16240/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,50087) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
J.L. AND M. H.-L. v. POLAND
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 15212/03
CHARZYNSKI c. POLOGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.01.2007 - 16240/02
A more detailed rendition of the relevant domestic law provisions is set out in the Court's judgment in Krasuski v. Poland, no. 61444/00, §§ 34-46, ECHR 2005-... (extracts) and in Charzynski v. Poland (dec.), no. 15212/03, §§ 12-23, ECHR 2005-. - EGMR, 23.09.1994 - 19823/92
HOKKANEN v. FINLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.01.2007 - 16240/02
It follows from these considerations that the Court's task is not to substitute itself for the domestic authorities in the exercise of their responsibilities for the regulation of the public care of children and the rights of parents whose children have been taken into care, but rather to review under the Convention the decisions taken by those authorities in the exercise of their power of appreciation (see, for example, Hokkanen v. Finland, judgment of 23 September 1994, Series A no. 299-A, p. 20, § 55, and Johansen v. Norway, judgment of 7 August 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-III, § 64). - EGMR, 24.03.1988 - 10465/83
OLSSON v. SWEDEN (No. 1)
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.01.2007 - 16240/02
In determining whether the impugned measures were "necessary in a democratic society", the Court will consider whether, in the light of the case as a whole, the reasons adduced to justify them were relevant and sufficient for the purpose of paragraph 2 of Article 8 of the Convention (see, inter alia, Olsson v. Sweden (no. 1), judgment of 24 March 1988, Series A no. 130, p. 32, § 68). - EGMR, 27.11.1992 - 13441/87
OLSSON c. SUÈDE (N° 2)
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.01.2007 - 16240/02
Moreover, it must be borne in mind that the national authorities have the benefit of direct contact with all the persons concerned (see Olsson v. Sweden (no. 2), judgment of 27 November 1992, Series A no. 250, pp. - EGMR, 19.09.2000 - 40031/98
GNAHORE c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.01.2007 - 16240/02
In this context, the Court reiterates its case-law in which it held that it is in a child's interest for its family ties to be maintained, as severing such ties means cutting a child off from its roots, which can only be justified in very exceptional circumstances (see Gnahoré v. France, no. 40031/98, § 59, ECHR 2000-IX, Johansen, cited above, pp. 1008-1009, § 78, and P.,C. and S. v. United Kingdom, cited above, § 118).