Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 23.02.1999 - 32969/96 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1999,31815) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BIFL v. SWITZERLAND
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 12.07.1988 - 10862/84
SCHENK c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.02.1999 - 32969/96
The Court refers, on this point, to its established case-law (see e.g. the Garcia Ruiz v. Spain judgment of 21 January 1999, § 28 to be published in the Court's official reports; the Schenk v. Switzerland judgment of 12 July 1988, Series A no. 140, p. 29, § 45). - EGMR, 27.08.1991 - 12750/87
PHILIS v. GREECE
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.02.1999 - 32969/96
The Court's task is to ascertain whether the proceedings considered as a whole, including the way in which evidence was taken, were fair (see e.g. the Asch v. Austria judgment of 26 April 1991, Series A no. 209, § 10). - EGMR, 15.06.1992 - 12433/86
LÜDI v. SWITZERLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.02.1999 - 32969/96
According to the Court's case-law, the defendant must be given an adequate and proper opportunity to challenge and question a witness against him, either when he makes his statements or at a later stage (see e.g. the Lüdi v. Switzerland judgment of 15 June 1992, Series A no. 238, p. 21, § 49).