Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KOIVUSAARI AND OTHERS v. FINLAND

  Art. 6, Art. 13, Art. 14, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 12 Art. 1 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (11)

• EGMR, 28.10.1999 - 24846/94

  ZIELINSKI ET PRADAL & GONZALEZ ET AUTRES c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.02.2010 - 20690/06

  24846/94 and 34165/96 to 34173/96, ECHR 1999-VII).
• EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 13427/87

  RAFFINERIES GRECQUES STRAN ET STRATIS ANDREADIS c. GRÈCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.02.2010 - 20690/06

  The Court reiterates that although, in theory, the legislature is not precluded in civil matters from adopting new retrospective provisions to regulate rights arising under existing law, the principle of the rule of law and the notion of fair trial enshrined in Article 6 of the Convention preclude any interference by the legislature - other than on compelling grounds of the general interest - with the administration of justice designed to influence the judicial determination of a dispute (see Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], cited above, § 126; Zielinski and Pradal and Gonzalez and Others v. France [GC], cited above, § 57; Stran Greek Refineries and Stratis Andreadis v. Greece, 9 December 1994, Series A no. 301-B; and Papageorgiou v. Greece, 22 October 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-VI).
• EGMR, 10.07.2002 - 39794/98

  GRATZINGER ET GRATZINGEROVA c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.02.2010 - 20690/06

  Further, the hope that a long-extinguished property right may be revived cannot be regarded as a "possession"; nor can a conditional claim which has lapsed as a result of a failure to fulfil the condition (Gratzinger and Gratzingerova v. the Czech Republic (dec.) [GC], no. 39794/98, § 69, ECHR 2002-VII).

 
• EGMR, 23.09.1982 - 7151/75

  SPORRONG ET LÖNNROTH c. SUÈDE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.02.2010 - 20690/06

  As to the first condition, the Court reiterates that, in accordance with its established case-law, Article 6 § 1 of the Convention is applicable only if there is a genuine and serious "dispute" (see Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden, 23 September 1982, § 81, Series A no. 52) over "civil rights and obligations".
• EGMR, 20.11.1995 - 17849/91

  PRESSOS COMPANIA NAVIERA S.A. ET AUTRES c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.02.2010 - 20690/06

  The Court has still to consider whether there was nevertheless a sufficient legal basis in support of the applicants' claim to warrant it being regarded as an "asset" as another aspect of the notion of "legitimate expectation" was illustrated in Pressos Compania Naviera S.A. and Others v. Belgium (20 November 1995, § 31, Series A no. 332).
• EGMR, 25.11.1993 - 14282/88

  ZANDER v. SWEDEN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.02.2010 - 20690/06

  The dispute may relate not only to the existence of a right but also to its scope and the manner of its exercise (see, inter alia, Zander v. Sweden, 25 November 1993, § 22, Series A no. 279-B).
• EGMR, 21.09.1994 - 17101/90

  FAYED c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.02.2010 - 20690/06

  The outcome of the proceedings must be directly decisive for the right in question, mere tenuous connections or remote consequences not being sufficient to bring Article 6 § 1 into play (see, inter alia, Masson and Van Zon v. the Netherlands, 28 September 1995, § 44, Series A no. 327-A; and Fayed v. the United Kingdom, 21 September 1994, § 56, Series A no. 294-B).
• EGMR, 26.03.1992 - 11760/85

  ÉDITIONS PÉRISCOPE v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.02.2010 - 20690/06

  Furthermore, "Article 6 § 1 extends to 'contestations' (disputes) over (civil) 'rights' which can be said, at least on arguable grounds, to be recognised under domestic law, irrespective of whether they are also protected under the Convention" (see, inter alia, Editions Périscope v. France, 26 March 1992, § 35, Series A no. 234-B; and Zander v. Sweden, cited above).
• EGMR, 28.09.1995 - 15346/89

  MASSON AND VAN ZON v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.02.2010 - 20690/06

  The outcome of the proceedings must be directly decisive for the right in question, mere tenuous connections or remote consequences not being sufficient to bring Article 6 § 1 into play (see, inter alia, Masson and Van Zon v. the Netherlands, 28 September 1995, § 44, Series A no. 327-A; and Fayed v. the United Kingdom, 21 September 1994, § 56, Series A no. 294-B).
• EGMR, 29.11.1991 - 12742/87

  PINE VALLEY DEVELOPMENTS LTD ET AUTRES c. IRLANDE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.02.2010 - 20690/06

  The Court has found in the cases Pine Valley Developments Ltd and Others v. Ireland (29 November 1991, § 51, Series A no. 222) and Stretch v. the United Kingdom (no. 44277/98, § 35, 24 June 2003) that the persons concerned were entitled to rely on the fact that the legal act on the basis of which they had incurred financial obligations would not be retrospectively invalidated to their detriment.
• EGMR, 16.12.1999 - 24888/94

  Mord an James Bulger

• EGMR, 10.05.2012 - 34796/09

  ALBU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA

  Thus, future income cannot be considered to constitute "possessions" unless it has already been earned or is definitely payable (see, for example, Koivusaari and others v. Finland (dec.), no. 20690/06, 23 February 2010).
• EGMR, 06.03.2012 - 54577/07

  DAVID AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA

  Thus, future income cannot be considered to constitute "possessions" unless it has already been earned or is definitely payable (see, for example, Koivusaari and others v. Finland (dec.), no. 20690/06, 23 February 2010).
• EGMR, 06.09.2011 - 65161/10

  ZELCA AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA

  Thus, future income cannot be considered to constitute "possessions" unless it has already been earned or is definitely payable (see, for example, Koivusaari and others v. Finland (dec.), no. 20690/06, 23 February 2010).