Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  M.A.K. AND R.K. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 13, Art. 41 MRK
  Reminder inadmissible Violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 13 Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 23.03.2010 - 45901/05, 40146/06
• EGMR, 08.03.2012 - 45901/05

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (9)

• EGMR, 30.09.2008 - 38000/05

  R.K. AND A.K. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.03.2010 - 45901/05

  As mentioned above, there must be a factor apart from the normal implementation of those duties which brings the matter within the scope of Article 3 (see R.K. and A.K. v. the United Kingdom, no. 38000/05, 30 September 2008).

  Finally, the Government relied on the Court's recent judgment in R.K. and A.K. v. the United Kingdom, no. 38000/05, § 36, 30 September 2008, in which the Court held that.

  The authorities, both medical and social, have duties to protect children and cannot be held liable every time genuine and reasonably held concerns about the safety of children vis-à-vis members of their family are proved, retrospectively, to have been misguided (R.K. and A.K. v. the United Kingdom, no. 38000/05, § 36, 30 September 2008).

• EGMR, 16.12.1999 - 24888/94

  Mord an James Bulger

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.03.2010 - 45901/05

  The Court's case-law establishes that Article 3, which prohibits torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, cannot be relied on where distress and anguish, however deep, flows, inevitably, from measures which are otherwise compatible with the Convention, unless there is a special element which causes the suffering to go beyond that inherent in their implementation (see, mutatis mutandis, Tyrer v. the United Kingdom judgment of 25 April 1978, Series A no. 26, p. 15, § 30; Soering v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161, p. 39, § 100; V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24888/94, § 71, ECHR 1999-IX).
• EGMR, 10.05.2001 - 28945/95

  T.P. ET K.M. c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.03.2010 - 45901/05

  With regard to the claim for non-pecuniary damage, they relied on the case of T.P. and K.M. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28945/95, ECHR 2001-V (extracts), in which the applicants were each awarded GBP 10, 000 in respect of a separation which lasted a year.

 
• EGMR, 29.04.2002 - 2346/02

  Vereinbarkeit der strafrechtlichen Verfolgung der Beihilfe zum Selbstmord mit der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.03.2010 - 45901/05

  The Court considers that the decision to take a blood test and photograph the second applicant against her parents' express instructions gave rise to an interference with her right to respect for her private life and, in particular, her right to physical integrity (see X and Y v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1985, § 22, Series A no. 91; Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, §§ 61 and 63, ECHR 2002-III; Y.F. v. Turkey, no. 24209/94, § 33, ECHR 2003-IX; and Glass v. the United Kingdom, no. 61827/00, § 70, ECHR 2004-II).
• EGMR, 28.05.1985 - 8225/78

  ASHINGDANE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.03.2010 - 45901/05

  Furthermore, a limitation will not be compatible with Article 6 § 1 if it does not pursue a legitimate aim and if there is not a reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought to be achieved (Ashingdane v the United Kingdom, judgment of 28 May 1985, Series A no. 93, p. 24, § 57; Prince Hans-Adam II of Liechtenstein v. Germany [GC], no. 42527/98, § 44, ECHR 2001 - VIII, mutatis mutandis).
• EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 14038/88

  Jens Söring

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.03.2010 - 45901/05

  The Court's case-law establishes that Article 3, which prohibits torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, cannot be relied on where distress and anguish, however deep, flows, inevitably, from measures which are otherwise compatible with the Convention, unless there is a special element which causes the suffering to go beyond that inherent in their implementation (see, mutatis mutandis, Tyrer v. the United Kingdom judgment of 25 April 1978, Series A no. 26, p. 15, § 30; Soering v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161, p. 39, § 100; V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24888/94, § 71, ECHR 1999-IX).
• EGMR, 09.10.1979 - 6289/73

  AIREY v. IRELAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.03.2010 - 45901/05

  The Court reiterates the importance of the right of access to a court, having regard to the prominent place held in a democratic society by the right to a fair trial (Airey v. Ireland, judgment of 9 October 1979, Series A no. 32, p. 12-13, § 24).
• EGMR, 25.04.1978 - 5856/72

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.03.2010 - 45901/05

  The Court's case-law establishes that Article 3, which prohibits torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, cannot be relied on where distress and anguish, however deep, flows, inevitably, from measures which are otherwise compatible with the Convention, unless there is a special element which causes the suffering to go beyond that inherent in their implementation (see, mutatis mutandis, Tyrer v. the United Kingdom judgment of 25 April 1978, Series A no. 26, p. 15, § 30; Soering v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161, p. 39, § 100; V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24888/94, § 71, ECHR 1999-IX).
• EGMR, 26.02.2002 - 46800/99

  DEL SOL c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.03.2010 - 45901/05

  The Court further observes that the legal aid system in the United Kingdom offers individuals substantial guarantees to protect them from arbitrariness (Del Sol v. France, no. 46800/99, § 26, ECHR 2002-II).