Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 23.04.2002 - 46015/99 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2002,35853) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TARTAK v. POLAND
Art. 6 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TARTAK v. POLAND
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 30544/96
GARCÍA RUIZ v. SPAIN
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.04.2002 - 46015/99
Moreover, while Article 6 of the Convention guarantees the right to a fair hearing, it does not lay down any rules on the admissibility of evidence or the way it should be assessed, which are therefore primarily matters for regulation by national law and the national courts (see Garcia Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I). - EGMR, 24.02.1993 - 14396/88
FEY v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.04.2002 - 46015/99
As to the objective test, it must be determined whether, quite apart from the judge's personal conduct, there are ascertainable facts which may raise doubts as to his or her impartiality (the Fey v. Austria judgment of 24 February 1993, Series A no. 255-A, p. 12, § 30). - EGMR, 26.02.1993 - 13396/87
PADOVANI v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.04.2002 - 46015/99
Under the subjective test, the personal impartiality of a judge must be presumed until there is proof to the contrary (cf. Bulut v. Austria judgment of 22 February 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-II, p. 356, § 32; Padovani v. Italy judgment of 26 February 1993, Series A no. 257-B, p. 20, § 26). - EGMR, 21.12.2000 - 33958/96
WETTSTEIN v. SWITZERLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.04.2002 - 46015/99
The existence of impartiality for the purposes of Article 6 § 1 must be determined according to the principles laid down in the Court's case-law, namely according to a subjective test, that is on the basis of the personal conviction of a particular judge in a given case, and also according to an objective test, that is ascertaining whether the judge offered guarantees sufficient to exclude any legitimate doubt in this respect (see Wettstein v. Switzerland, no. 33958/96, § 42, ECHR 2000-XII [21.12.00]).