Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 23.05.2002 - 32555/96 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2002,46900) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ROCHE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 14, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Art. 13, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
Partly admissible Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 23.05.2002 - 32555/96
- EGMR, 19.10.2005 - 32555/96
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 21.11.2001 - 37112/97
FOGARTY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.05.2002 - 32555/96
In finding that section 10 amounted to a procedural bar to an existing right of action in tort and in thus finding Article 6 applicable, the High Court relied on the Tinnelly and McElduff judgment (Tinnelly & Sons Ltd and Others and McElduff and Others v. the United Kingdom judgment of 10 July 1998, Reports 1998-IV), and on the Fogarty judgment (Fogarty v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 37112/97, § 26, ECHR 2001-XI). - EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 10454/83
GASKIN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.05.2002 - 32555/96
As to his complaint under Article 8, the Government maintain that Article 8 does not apply: it does not confer a general right of access to information and the principles underlining the access of Mr Gaskin to his childhood care documents, are not applicable in the present case (Gaskin v. the United Kingdom judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 160). - EGMR, 26.03.1987 - 9248/81
LEANDER c. SUÈDE
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.05.2002 - 32555/96
As to Article 10, the Government point out that there is no right of access to information guaranteed by that Article (Leander v. Sweden judgment of 26 March 1987, Series A no. 116) and, even if there has been an interference with the applicant's Article 10 rights, it was justifiable for the reasons outlined above in relation to Article 8 of the Convention. - EGMR, 21.09.1993 - 12350/86
KREMZOW v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.05.2002 - 32555/96
The Court considers therefore that the question of the applicant's completion of those procedures should be joined to the merits of his complaints (Kremzow v. Austria judgment of 21 September 1993, Series A no. 268-B, § 42, and the above-cited McGinley and Egan judgment, § 75).