Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 23.05.2006 - 48925/99, 36109/04 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2006,55528) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TURK TICARET BANKASI MUNZAM SOSYAL GUVENLIK EMEKLI VE YARDIM SANDIGI VAKFI v. TURKEY
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 06.07.2000 - 41237/98
MOURA CARREIRA and MARGARIDA LOURENCO CARREIRA v. PORTUGAL
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.05.2006 - 48925/99
The Court has previously held that interlocutory proceedings relating to an interim injunction, in which no decision on the merits of the case is made, do not involve a determination of civil rights and obligations (see APIS a.s. v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 39754/98, 13 January 2000, unreported, and Moura Carreira and Lourenço Carreira v. Portugal (dec.), no. 41237/98, ECHR 2000-VIII). - EGMR, 29.10.1991 - 11826/85
HELMERS c. SUÈDE
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.05.2006 - 48925/99
The absence of a hearing on appeal or cassation may not raise an issue under Article 6 § 1 if the higher court was not determining an issue on the merits (see Helmers v. Sweden, judgment of 29 October 1991, Series A no. 212-A, p. 16, § 36; Meftah and Others v. France [GC], nos. 32911/96, 35237/97 and 34595/97, § 41, ECHR 2002-VII). - EGMR, 26.07.2002 - 32911/96
MEFTAH AND OTHERS v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.05.2006 - 48925/99
The absence of a hearing on appeal or cassation may not raise an issue under Article 6 § 1 if the higher court was not determining an issue on the merits (see Helmers v. Sweden, judgment of 29 October 1991, Series A no. 212-A, p. 16, § 36; Meftah and Others v. France [GC], nos. 32911/96, 35237/97 and 34595/97, § 41, ECHR 2002-VII). - EGMR, 13.01.2000 - 39754/98
APIS a.s. v. SLOVAKIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.05.2006 - 48925/99
The Court has previously held that interlocutory proceedings relating to an interim injunction, in which no decision on the merits of the case is made, do not involve a determination of civil rights and obligations (see APIS a.s. v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 39754/98, 13 January 2000, unreported, and Moura Carreira and Lourenço Carreira v. Portugal (dec.), no. 41237/98, ECHR 2000-VIII).