Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 23.05.2023 - 20081/19, 20108/19, 20115/19, 20122/19, 20129/19, 20134/19, 20140/19, 55037/19, 55041/19, 55045/19, 55047/19, 55049/19, 55051/19, 5926/20, 5948/20, 5965/20, 5985/20, 6013/20, 6034/20, 6046/20, 6058/20   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2023,11218
EGMR, 23.05.2023 - 20081/19, 20108/19, 20115/19, 20122/19, 20129/19, 20134/19, 20140/19, 55037/19, 55041/19, 55045/19, 55047/19, 55049/19, 55051/19, 5926/20, 5948/20, 5965/20, 5985/20, 6013/20, 6034/20, 6046/20, 6058/20 (https://dejure.org/2023,11218)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 23.05.2023 - 20081/19, 20108/19, 20115/19, 20122/19, 20129/19, 20134/19, 20140/19, 55037/19, 55041/19, 55045/19, 55047/19, 55049/19, 55051/19, 5926/20, 5948/20, 5965/20, 5985/20, 6013/20, 6034/20, 6046/20, 6058/20 (https://dejure.org/2023,11218)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 23. Mai 2023 - 20081/19, 20108/19, 20115/19, 20122/19, 20129/19, 20134/19, 20140/19, 55037/19, 55041/19, 55045/19, 55047/19, 55049/19, 55051/19, 5926/20, 5948/20, 5965/20, 5985/20, 6013/20, 6034/20, 6046/20, 6058/20 (https://dejure.org/2023,11218)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2023,11218) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    BUHUCEANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA

    Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just ...

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

  • EuGH, 05.06.2018 - C-673/16

    Der Begriff "Ehegatte" im Sinne der unionsrechtlichen Bestimmungen über die

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.05.2023 - 20081/19
    The findings of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in the Coman and Others case (judgment of 5 June 2018, C-673/16, ECLI:EU:C:2018:385) are summarised in Fedotova and Others (cited above, § 60).
  • EGMR - 28473/12 (anhängig)

    KREJZOVÁ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.05.2023 - 20081/19
    Referring to the Court's case-law in respect of cases such as Dubská and Krejzová v. the Czech Republic ([GC], nos. 28859/11 and 28473/12, 15 November 2016) and S.H. and Others v. Austria ([GC], no. 57813/00, ECHR 2011), they contended that consensus was a significant factor in any evaluation made by the Court but that it was not necessarily decisive or determinative.
  • EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08

    CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.05.2023 - 20081/19
    The applicants have to show that they are personally affected by the contested legislation (see, for instance, Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 101, ECHR 2014).
  • EGMR, 22.01.2008 - 43546/02

    E.B. v. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.05.2023 - 20081/19
    In cases where a particularly vulnerable group in society had suffered discrimination, the State's margin of appreciation had been found to be substantively narrower (see E.B. v. France [GC], no. 43546/02, § 94, 22 January 2008).
  • EGMR, 12.12.2023 - 11454/17

    PRZYBYSZEWSKA AND OTHERS v. POLAND

    To that end, it must examine whether, having regard to the margin of appreciation afforded to it, the respondent State struck a fair balance between the prevailing interests it relied on and the interests claimed by the applicants (see Fedotova and Others, cited above, § 191, and Buhuceanu and Others v. Romania, nos. 20081/19 and 20 others, § 75, 23 May 2023).

    I refer in this respect to the views I expressed in my dissenting opinion appended to the judgment in Fedotova v. Russia ([GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, 17 January 2023), which were further developed in my joint dissenting opinion with Judge Harutyunyan in Buhuceanu v. Romania (nos. 20081/19 and 20 others, 23 May 2023).

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht