Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 23.06.2015 - 22830/14 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2015,17900) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
VUJCIC v. CROATIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 39 MRK
Struck out of the list (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (7)
- EGMR, 26.07.2001 - 51585/99
HORVAT v. CROATIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2015 - 22830/14
The Court has established in a number of cases (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006 V; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; and Wende and Kukówka v. Poland, no. 56026/00, 10 May 2007), including those brought against Croatia (see, for example, Horvat v. Croatia, no. 51585/99, ECHR 2001 VIII; Kozlica v. Croatia, no. 29182/03, 2 November 2006; and Pavic v. Croatia, no. 21846/08, 28 January 2010), its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time. - EGMR, 11.10.2005 - 52690/99
MAJEWSKI v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2015 - 22830/14
The Court has established in a number of cases (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006 V; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; and Wende and Kukówka v. Poland, no. 56026/00, 10 May 2007), including those brought against Croatia (see, for example, Horvat v. Croatia, no. 51585/99, ECHR 2001 VIII; Kozlica v. Croatia, no. 29182/03, 2 November 2006; and Pavic v. Croatia, no. 21846/08, 28 January 2010), its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time. - EGMR, 02.11.2006 - 29182/03
KOZLICA v. CROATIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2015 - 22830/14
The Court has established in a number of cases (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006 V; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; and Wende and Kukówka v. Poland, no. 56026/00, 10 May 2007), including those brought against Croatia (see, for example, Horvat v. Croatia, no. 51585/99, ECHR 2001 VIII; Kozlica v. Croatia, no. 29182/03, 2 November 2006; and Pavic v. Croatia, no. 21846/08, 28 January 2010), its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time.
- EGMR, 28.01.2010 - 21846/08
PAVIC v. CROATIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2015 - 22830/14
The Court has established in a number of cases (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006 V; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; and Wende and Kukówka v. Poland, no. 56026/00, 10 May 2007), including those brought against Croatia (see, for example, Horvat v. Croatia, no. 51585/99, ECHR 2001 VIII; Kozlica v. Croatia, no. 29182/03, 2 November 2006; and Pavic v. Croatia, no. 21846/08, 28 January 2010), its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time. - EGMR, 10.05.2007 - 56026/00
WENDE AND KUKOWKA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2015 - 22830/14
The Court has established in a number of cases (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006 V; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; and Wende and Kukówka v. Poland, no. 56026/00, 10 May 2007), including those brought against Croatia (see, for example, Horvat v. Croatia, no. 51585/99, ECHR 2001 VIII; Kozlica v. Croatia, no. 29182/03, 2 November 2006; and Pavic v. Croatia, no. 21846/08, 28 January 2010), its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time. - EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 28953/03
SULWINSKA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2015 - 22830/14
To this end, the Court will examine carefully the declaration in the light of the principles established in its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (Tahsin Acar v. Turkey [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI; WAZA Spólka z o.o. v. Poland (dec.), no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007; and Sulwinska v. Poland (dec.), no. 28953/03, 18 September 2007). - EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2015 - 22830/14
The Court has established in a number of cases (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006 V; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; and Wende and Kukówka v. Poland, no. 56026/00, 10 May 2007), including those brought against Croatia (see, for example, Horvat v. Croatia, no. 51585/99, ECHR 2001 VIII; Kozlica v. Croatia, no. 29182/03, 2 November 2006; and Pavic v. Croatia, no. 21846/08, 28 January 2010), its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time.