Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  COSTEL GACIU v. ROMANIA

  Art. 3, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 14, Art. 14+8 MRK
  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect) Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life Article 8-1 - ...

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 39633/10
• EGMR, 23.06.2015 - 39633/10
• EGMR, 07.06.2016 - 39633/10
• EGMR - 39633/10 (anhängig)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 10.04.2012 - 20496/02

  SILICKIENE v. LITHUANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2015 - 39633/10

  Namely, the applicant's wife was neither a witness nor a co-accused in the criminal case against her husband, which removed the risk of collusion or other forms of obstructing the process of collecting evidence (see, in contrast, mutatis mutandis, Silickiene v. Lithuania, no. 20496/02, §§ 28 and 29, 10 April 2012).
• EGMR, 04.12.2007 - 44362/04

  DICKSON c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2015 - 39633/10

  Accordingly, this is an area in which the Contracting States enjoy a wide margin of appreciation in determining the steps to be taken to ensure compliance with the Convention with due regard to the needs and resources of the community and of individuals (see Dickson v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 44362/04, § 81, ECHR 2007-V).
• EGMR, 24.07.2001 - 44558/98

  VALASINAS v. LITHUANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2015 - 39633/10

  The Court reiterates that under Article 3 of the Convention the State must ensure that a person is detained in conditions which are compatible with respect for his human dignity, that the manner and method of execution of the measure of detention do not subject him to distress or hardship of an intensity exceeding the unavoidable level of suffering inherent in detention and that, given the practical demands of imprisonment, his health and well-being are adequately secured (see Valasinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, § 102, ECHR 2001-VIII, and Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 94, ECHR 2000-XI).

 
• EGMR, 03.04.2003 - 31583/96

  KLAMECKI v. POLAND (No. 2)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2015 - 39633/10

  Accordingly, the Court is not persuaded that there was a particular reason to prevent the applicant from having conjugal visits from his wife (see, by contrast, Klamecki v. Poland (no. 2), no. 31583/96, § 135, 3 April 2003; Baginski v. Poland, no. 37444/97, § 92 et seq., 11 October 2005; and Kucera v. Slovakia, no. 48666/99, § 130, 17 July 2007).
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2015 - 39633/10

  The Court reiterates that under Article 3 of the Convention the State must ensure that a person is detained in conditions which are compatible with respect for his human dignity, that the manner and method of execution of the measure of detention do not subject him to distress or hardship of an intensity exceeding the unavoidable level of suffering inherent in detention and that, given the practical demands of imprisonment, his health and well-being are adequately secured (see Valasinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, § 102, ECHR 2001-VIII, and Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 94, ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 17.07.2007 - 48666/99

  KUCERA v. SLOVAKIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2015 - 39633/10

  Accordingly, the Court is not persuaded that there was a particular reason to prevent the applicant from having conjugal visits from his wife (see, by contrast, Klamecki v. Poland (no. 2), no. 31583/96, § 135, 3 April 2003; Baginski v. Poland, no. 37444/97, § 92 et seq., 11 October 2005; and Kucera v. Slovakia, no. 48666/99, § 130, 17 July 2007).