Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 23.06.2020 - 61919/16 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2020,15661) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ENGELS v. RUSSIA
Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-general (Article 10-1 - Freedom to impart information;Freedom to receive information);Violation of Article 13+10 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 10 - Freedom of ...
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 3111/10
Menschenrechtsgerichtshof verurteilt Türkei wegen Online-Zensur
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2020 - 61919/16
It applies not only to the content of information but also to the means of its dissemination, for any restriction imposed on the latter necessarily interferes with that freedom (see Ahmet Yildirim v. Turkey, no. 3111/10, §§ 48-54, ECHR 2012). - EGMR, 01.12.2015 - 48226/10
Türkei wegen YouTube-Blockade verurteilt
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2020 - 61919/16
It amounted therefore to "interference by a public authority" with the right to receive and impart information, since Article 10 guarantees not only the right to impart information but also the right of the public to receive it (see Ahmet Yildirim, cited above, §§ 51 and 55, and Cengiz and Others v. Turkey, nos. 48226/10 and 14027/11, § 56, ECHR 2015 (extracts)).
- EGMR - 226/18 (anhängig)
YEVSTIFEYEV v. RUSSIA and 16 other applications
In application no. 46226/21, did the applicant have at his disposal an effective domestic remedy for his Convention complaints, as required by Article 13 of the Convention (see Engels v. Russia, no. 61919/16, §§ 41-44, 23 June 2020)?.