Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GAYEVA v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Torture) (Substantive ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  GAYEVA v. RUSSIA

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93

  Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2020 - 688/11

  Having regard to the particular circumstances of this case and its finding in respect of the procedural aspect of Article 2 of the Convention (see paragraph 60 above), the Court does not deem it necessary to make a separate finding under Article 3 of the Convention in respect of the alleged deficiencies in the investigation (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 117, ECHR 2000-VII, and Khambulatova v. Russia, no. 33488/04, § 110, 3 March 2011).
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2020 - 688/11

  The Court reiterates that where an individual is taken into police custody in good health and is found to be injured upon release, it is incumbent on the State to provide a plausible explanation of how those injuries were caused (see, among other authorities, Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 87, ECHR 1999-V, and Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, § 92, ECHR 2010).
• EGMR, 03.03.2011 - 33488/04

  KHAMBULATOVA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2020 - 688/11

  Having regard to the particular circumstances of this case and its finding in respect of the procedural aspect of Article 2 of the Convention (see paragraph 60 above), the Court does not deem it necessary to make a separate finding under Article 3 of the Convention in respect of the alleged deficiencies in the investigation (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 117, ECHR 2000-VII, and Khambulatova v. Russia, no. 33488/04, § 110, 3 March 2011).

 
• EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97

  ANGUELOVA v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2020 - 688/11

  Indeed, the burden of proof may be regarded as resting on the authorities to provide a satisfactory and convincing explanation (see, among many other authorities, Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, §§ 109-11, ECHR 2002-IV).
• EGMR, 30.03.2016 - 5878/08

  ARMANI DA SILVA c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2020 - 688/11

  The obligation to carry out an effective investigation into allegations of treatment infringing Articles 2 and 3 suffered at the hands of State agents is well established in the Court's case-law (see Armani Da Silva v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 5878/08, §§ 229-39, ECHR 2016; El-Masri, cited above, §§ 182-85, ECHR 2012; and Mocanu and Others v. Romania [GC], nos. 10865/09 and 2 others, §§ 316-26, ECHR 2014 (extracts)).
• EGMR, 27.07.2004 - 57671/00

  SLIMANI v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2020 - 688/11

  As a general rule, the mere fact that an individual dies in suspicious circumstances while in custody should raise an issue as to whether the State has complied with its obligation to protect that person's right to life (see Slimani v. France, no. 57671/00, § 27, ECHR 2004-IX (extracts)).
• EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

  McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2020 - 688/11

  The Court has firstly to establish whether the costs and expenses indicated by the applicant were actually incurred and, secondly, whether they were necessary (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, § 220, Series A no. 324).