Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 23.06.2020 - 68837/14 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2020,39491) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MOLDOVAN v. ROMANIA
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 22.04.1992 - 12351/86
VIDAL c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2020 - 68837/14
The Court reiterates in this connection that the domestic courts are best placed to assess the credibility of witnesses and the relevance of evidence to the issues in the case (see, among many other authorities, Vidal v. Belgium, 22 April 1992, § 32, Series A no. 235-B; Melnychuk v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 28743/03, ECHR 2005-IX; and Karpenko v. Russia, no. 5605/04, § 80, 13 March 2012). - EGMR, 05.07.2005 - 28743/03
MELNITCHOUK c. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2020 - 68837/14
The Court reiterates in this connection that the domestic courts are best placed to assess the credibility of witnesses and the relevance of evidence to the issues in the case (see, among many other authorities, Vidal v. Belgium, 22 April 1992, § 32, Series A no. 235-B; Melnychuk v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 28743/03, ECHR 2005-IX; and Karpenko v. Russia, no. 5605/04, § 80, 13 March 2012). - EGMR, 13.03.2012 - 5605/04
KARPENKO v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2020 - 68837/14
The Court reiterates in this connection that the domestic courts are best placed to assess the credibility of witnesses and the relevance of evidence to the issues in the case (see, among many other authorities, Vidal v. Belgium, 22 April 1992, § 32, Series A no. 235-B; Melnychuk v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 28743/03, ECHR 2005-IX; and Karpenko v. Russia, no. 5605/04, § 80, 13 March 2012).