Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 1993/17   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2022,14825
EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 1993/17 (https://dejure.org/2022,14825)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 23.06.2022 - 1993/17 (https://dejure.org/2022,14825)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 23. Juni 2022 - 1993/17 (https://dejure.org/2022,14825)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2022,14825) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    KOZIN v. RUSSIA

    Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an ...

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (10)

  • EGMR, 13.10.2016 - 31928/15

    KONOVALCHUK v. UKRAINE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 1993/17
    Nevertheless, this does not mean that each detainee must be guaranteed the same level of medical treatment that is available in the best health establishments outside prison facilities (see, for instance, Sadretdinov v. Russia, no. 17564/06, § 67, 24 May 2016, with further references, and Konovalchuk v. Ukraine, no. 31928/15, § 52, 13 October 2016, with further references).
  • EGMR, 24.05.2016 - 17564/06

    SADRETDINOV v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 1993/17
    Nevertheless, this does not mean that each detainee must be guaranteed the same level of medical treatment that is available in the best health establishments outside prison facilities (see, for instance, Sadretdinov v. Russia, no. 17564/06, § 67, 24 May 2016, with further references, and Konovalchuk v. Ukraine, no. 31928/15, § 52, 13 October 2016, with further references).
  • EGMR, 20.05.2010 - 35581/06

    POKHLEBIN v. UKRAINE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 1993/17
    It has clarified in this context that the authorities must ensure that diagnosis and care are prompt and accurate (see, for example, Gorbulya v. Russia, no. 31535/09, § 62, 6 March 2014, with further references, and Pokhlebin v. Ukraine, no. 35581/06, § 62, 20 May 2010, with further references) and that - where necessitated by the nature of a medical condition - supervision is regular and systematic and involves a comprehensive therapeutic strategy aimed at successfully treating the detainee's health problems or preventing their aggravation (see, inter alia, Ukhan v. Ukraine, no. 30628/02, § 74, 18 December 2008, with further references, and Kolesnikovich v. Russia, no. 44694/13, § 70, 22 March 2016, with further references).
  • EGMR, 22.03.2016 - 44694/13

    KOLESNIKOVICH v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 1993/17
    It has clarified in this context that the authorities must ensure that diagnosis and care are prompt and accurate (see, for example, Gorbulya v. Russia, no. 31535/09, § 62, 6 March 2014, with further references, and Pokhlebin v. Ukraine, no. 35581/06, § 62, 20 May 2010, with further references) and that - where necessitated by the nature of a medical condition - supervision is regular and systematic and involves a comprehensive therapeutic strategy aimed at successfully treating the detainee's health problems or preventing their aggravation (see, inter alia, Ukhan v. Ukraine, no. 30628/02, § 74, 18 December 2008, with further references, and Kolesnikovich v. Russia, no. 44694/13, § 70, 22 March 2016, with further references).
  • EGMR, 08.01.2013 - 56027/10

    RESHETNYAK v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 1993/17
    The Court has already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case (see Blokhin v. Russia [GC], no. 47152/06, §§ 120-50, ECHR 2016, Reshetnyak v. Russia, no. 56027/10, §§ 49-101, 8 January 2013 and Koryak v. Russia, no. 24677/10, §§ 70-110, 13 November 2012).
  • EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 24677/10

    KORYAK v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 1993/17
    The Court has already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case (see Blokhin v. Russia [GC], no. 47152/06, §§ 120-50, ECHR 2016, Reshetnyak v. Russia, no. 56027/10, §§ 49-101, 8 January 2013 and Koryak v. Russia, no. 24677/10, §§ 70-110, 13 November 2012).
  • EGMR, 06.03.2014 - 31535/09

    GORBULYA v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 1993/17
    It has clarified in this context that the authorities must ensure that diagnosis and care are prompt and accurate (see, for example, Gorbulya v. Russia, no. 31535/09, § 62, 6 March 2014, with further references, and Pokhlebin v. Ukraine, no. 35581/06, § 62, 20 May 2010, with further references) and that - where necessitated by the nature of a medical condition - supervision is regular and systematic and involves a comprehensive therapeutic strategy aimed at successfully treating the detainee's health problems or preventing their aggravation (see, inter alia, Ukhan v. Ukraine, no. 30628/02, § 74, 18 December 2008, with further references, and Kolesnikovich v. Russia, no. 44694/13, § 70, 22 March 2016, with further references).
  • EGMR, 08.10.2015 - 28333/13

    TSELOVALNIK v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 1993/17
    Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Kolesnikovich, cited above, §§ 82-92, Tselovalnik v. Russia, no. 28333/13, §§ 70-77, 8 October 2015 and Budanov v. Russia, no. 66583/11, §§ 77-83, 9 January 2014), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sum indicated in the appended table.
  • EGMR, 09.01.2014 - 66583/11

    BUDANOV v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 1993/17
    Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Kolesnikovich, cited above, §§ 82-92, Tselovalnik v. Russia, no. 28333/13, §§ 70-77, 8 October 2015 and Budanov v. Russia, no. 66583/11, §§ 77-83, 9 January 2014), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sum indicated in the appended table.
  • EGMR, 17.05.2005 - 74456/01

    HORVATHOVA v. SLOVAKIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 1993/17
    The Court takes into account Ms Kozina's statement and, in line with its case-law (see Horváthová v. Slovakia, no. 74456/01, §§ 25-27, 17 May 2005) accepts that she has standing to pursue the proceedings initiated by the applicant.
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht