Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  IVANTSOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture;Degrading treatment);Violation of ...

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (10)

• VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Württemberg, 18.02.2005 - 12/02

  Neugliederung von Kirchengemeinden

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 20509/17

  12/02/2017.
• EGMR, 31.07.2000 - 34578/97

  JECIUS v. LITHUANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 20509/17

  The Court reiterates that where an applicant dies during the examination of a case, his or her heirs may in principle pursue the application on his or her behalf (see Jecius v. Lithuania, no. 34578/97, § 41, ECHR 2000-IX).
• EGMR, 02.02.2006 - 54673/00

  LATIF FUAT ÖZTÜRK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 20509/17

  It further reiterates that in a number of cases in which applicants have died in the course of the proceedings, it has taken into account the statements of their heirs or close family members expressing their wish to pursue the proceedings before the Court (see Latif Fuat Öztürk v. Turkey, no. 54673/00, § 27, 2 February 2006, and Hanbayat v. Turkey, no. 18378/02, § 20, 17 July 2007).

 
• EGMR, 17.07.2007 - 18378/02

  HANBAYAT v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 20509/17

  It further reiterates that in a number of cases in which applicants have died in the course of the proceedings, it has taken into account the statements of their heirs or close family members expressing their wish to pursue the proceedings before the Court (see Latif Fuat Öztürk v. Turkey, no. 54673/00, § 27, 2 February 2006, and Hanbayat v. Turkey, no. 18378/02, § 20, 17 July 2007).
• EGMR, 10.05.2016 - 78774/13

  TOPEKHIN v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 20509/17

  The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding conditions of detention of disabled inmates (see, for instance, Topekhin v. Russia, no. 78774/13, §§ 78-81, 10 May 2016, and Butrin v. Russia, no. 16179/14, §§ 46-51, 22 March 2016).
• EGMR, 22.03.2016 - 16179/14

  BUTRIN v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 20509/17

  The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding conditions of detention of disabled inmates (see, for instance, Topekhin v. Russia, no. 78774/13, §§ 78-81, 10 May 2016, and Butrin v. Russia, no. 16179/14, §§ 46-51, 22 March 2016).
• EGMR, 02.12.2004 - 4672/02

  FARBTUHS c. LETTONIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 20509/17

  It reiterates in particular, that where the authorities decide to place and keep a disabled person in detention, they should demonstrate special care in securing detention conditions which correspond to the special needs resulting from his disability (see Butrin, cited above § 49; Semikhvostov v. Russia, no. 2689/12, § 72, 6 February 2014; Zarzycki v. Poland, no. 15351/03, § 102, 12 March 2013; and Farbtuhs v. Latvia, no. 4672/02, § 56, 2 December 2004).
• EGMR, 12.03.2013 - 15351/03

  ZARZYCKI v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 20509/17

  It reiterates in particular, that where the authorities decide to place and keep a disabled person in detention, they should demonstrate special care in securing detention conditions which correspond to the special needs resulting from his disability (see Butrin, cited above § 49; Semikhvostov v. Russia, no. 2689/12, § 72, 6 February 2014; Zarzycki v. Poland, no. 15351/03, § 102, 12 March 2013; and Farbtuhs v. Latvia, no. 4672/02, § 56, 2 December 2004).
• EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 41461/10

  DIRDIZOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 20509/17

  Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its findings in Blokhin v. Russia [GC], no. 47152/06, §§ 135-50, 23 March 2016, related to lack of medical assistance in detention, and Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, 27 November 2012, related to unreasonably long detention on remand.
• EGMR, 06.02.2014 - 2689/12

  SEMIKHVOSTOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 20509/17

  It reiterates in particular, that where the authorities decide to place and keep a disabled person in detention, they should demonstrate special care in securing detention conditions which correspond to the special needs resulting from his disability (see Butrin, cited above § 49; Semikhvostov v. Russia, no. 2689/12, § 72, 6 February 2014; Zarzycki v. Poland, no. 15351/03, § 102, 12 March 2013; and Farbtuhs v. Latvia, no. 4672/02, § 56, 2 December 2004).

• EGMR, 15.09.2022 - 63219/17

  MERZLYAKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  She also mentioned him as her only heir in her will (see, for similar reasoning, Magnitskiy and Others v. Russia, nos. 32631/09 and 53799/12, § 176, 27 August 2019, with further references, and Ivantsov and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 20509/17 and 9 others, § 7, 23 June 2022).