Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 23.07.2015 - 24312/10 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (5)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ANDONOVSKI v. \
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article ...
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ANDONOVSKI v. \
[MAC] Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article ...
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ANDONOVSKI v. \
[ALB] Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article ...
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ANDONOVSKI v. \
[MAC] Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article ...
- juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)
Sonstiges
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Neu Zitiert selbst (12)
- EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 57834/00
KABLAN contre la TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.07.2015 - 24312/10
In addition, a prompt response by the authorities in investigating allegations of ill-treatment is essential in maintaining public confidence in their maintenance of the rule of law and in preventing any appearance of collusion in or tolerance of unlawful acts (see Bati and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 136, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts), and Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italy [GC], no. 23458/02, § 305, ECHR 2011 (extracts)). - EGMR, 14.11.2013 - 54755/08
ALEKSANDR NIKONENKO v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.07.2015 - 24312/10
The minimum standards of effectiveness defined by the Court's case-law include the requirements that the investigation must be independent, impartial and subject to public scrutiny, and that the competent authorities must act with exemplary diligence and promptness (see Aleksandr Nikonenko v. Ukraine, no. 54755/08, § 44, 14 November 2013; Velev v. Bulgaria, no. 43531/08, § 49, 16 April 2013; and Menesheva v. Russia, no. 59261/00, § 67, ECHR 2006-III). - EGMR, 14.10.2010 - 24271/03
GEORGIY BYKOV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.07.2015 - 24312/10
Where allegations are made under Article 3 of the Convention the Court must apply a "particularly thorough scrutiny" (see, mutatis mutandis, Ribitsch v. Austria, 4 December 1995, § 32, Series A no. 336, and Georgiy Bykov v. Russia, no. 24271/03, § 51, 14 October 2010), even if certain domestic proceedings and investigations have already taken place (see Cobzaru v. Romania, no. 48254/99, § 65, 26 July 2007).
- EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 18896/91
RIBITSCH c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.07.2015 - 24312/10
Where allegations are made under Article 3 of the Convention the Court must apply a "particularly thorough scrutiny" (see, mutatis mutandis, Ribitsch v. Austria, 4 December 1995, § 32, Series A no. 336, and Georgiy Bykov v. Russia, no. 24271/03, § 51, 14 October 2010), even if certain domestic proceedings and investigations have already taken place (see Cobzaru v. Romania, no. 48254/99, § 65, 26 July 2007). - EGMR, 26.07.2007 - 48254/99
COBZARU v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.07.2015 - 24312/10
Where allegations are made under Article 3 of the Convention the Court must apply a "particularly thorough scrutiny" (see, mutatis mutandis, Ribitsch v. Austria, 4 December 1995, § 32, Series A no. 336, and Georgiy Bykov v. Russia, no. 24271/03, § 51, 14 October 2010), even if certain domestic proceedings and investigations have already taken place (see Cobzaru v. Romania, no. 48254/99, § 65, 26 July 2007). - EGMR, 27.08.1992 - 12850/87
TOMASI c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.07.2015 - 24312/10
It is incumbent on the State to provide a plausible explanation of how the injuries were caused (see Tomasi v. France, judgment of 27 August 1992, Series A no. 241-A, pp. 40-41, §§ 108-11; Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 87, ECHR 1999-V; and Ribitsch, cited above, § 34). - EGMR, 16.04.2013 - 43531/08
VELEV v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.07.2015 - 24312/10
The minimum standards of effectiveness defined by the Court's case-law include the requirements that the investigation must be independent, impartial and subject to public scrutiny, and that the competent authorities must act with exemplary diligence and promptness (see Aleksandr Nikonenko v. Ukraine, no. 54755/08, § 44, 14 November 2013; Velev v. Bulgaria, no. 43531/08, § 49, 16 April 2013; and Menesheva v. Russia, no. 59261/00, § 67, ECHR 2006-III). - EGMR, 04.04.2006 - 18944/02
CORSACOV v. MOLDOVA
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.07.2015 - 24312/10
The Court has held on many occasions that where a person is injured while in detention or otherwise under the control of the police, any such injury will give rise to a strong presumption that the person was subjected to ill-treatment (see Corsacov v. Moldova, no. 18944/02, § 55, 4 April 2006, and Bursuc v. Romania, no. 42066/98, § 80, 12 October 2004). - EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94
Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.07.2015 - 24312/10
It is incumbent on the State to provide a plausible explanation of how the injuries were caused (see Tomasi v. France, judgment of 27 August 1992, Series A no. 241-A, pp. 40-41, §§ 108-11; Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 87, ECHR 1999-V; and Ribitsch, cited above, § 34). - EGMR, 18.06.2002 - 25656/94
ORHAN v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.07.2015 - 24312/10
In the absence of such an explanation, the Court can draw inferences which may be unfavourable for the Government (see Orhan v. Turkey, no. 25656/94, § 274, 18 June 2002). - EGMR, 12.10.2004 - 42066/98
BURSUC c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 03.06.2004 - 33097/96
BATI AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 20.02.2024 - 53040/19
ILJAZ v. NORTH MACEDONIA
The national authorities therefore did not submit the applicant's case to the careful scrutiny required by Article 3 of the Convention (compare also Andonovski v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 24312/10, § 91, 23 July 2015). - EGMR, 01.03.2018 - 78241/13
SELAMI AND OTHERS v.
They cannot leave it to the initiative of the individual or of the next-of-kin either to lodge a formal complaint or to take responsibility for the conduct of any investigative procedures (see Bouyid v. Belgium [GC], no. 23380/09, § 116, ECHR 2015; El-Masri, cited above, § 182; Andonovski v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 24312/10, § 86, 23 July 2015; Gorgiev v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 26984/05, § 64, 19 April 2012 and Isayeva v. Russia, no. 57950/00, § 210, 24 February 2005, in the context of Article 2).