Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 23.07.2015 - 42164/09   

Sie müssen eingeloggt sein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen.

Sie haben noch kein Nutzerkonto? In weniger als einer Minute ist es eingerichtet und Sie können sofort diese und weitere kostenlose Zusatzfunktionen nutzen.

| | Was ist die Merkfunktion?
Ablegen in
Benachrichtigen, wenn:




 
Alle auswählen
 

Zitiervorschläge

https://dejure.org/2015,23352
EGMR, 23.07.2015 - 42164/09 (https://dejure.org/2015,23352)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 23.07.2015 - 42164/09 (https://dejure.org/2015,23352)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 23. Juli 2015 - 42164/09 (https://dejure.org/2015,23352)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2015,23352) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    SERIKOV v. UKRAINE

    Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) (englisch)

Sonstiges




Kontextvorschau:





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (8)  

  • EGMR, 22.09.2016 - 1574/06

    SAVCHENKO v. UKRAINE

    Therefore, contrary to the Government's submissions, the complaint is not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention (see Serikov v. Ukraine, no. 42164/09, § 53, 23 July 2015).
  • EGMR, 03.03.2016 - 26230/11

    KAPUSTYAK v. UKRAINE

    Therefore, contrary to the Government's submissions, the complaint is not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention (compare Serikov v. Ukraine, no. 42164/09, § 53, 23 July 2015).
  • EGMR, 27.03.2018 - 47889/08

    VOYKIN AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

    The Court has previously held in various contexts that this investigative procedure does not comply with the principles of an effective remedy, in particular because the enquiring officer can take only a limited number of procedural steps within that procedure and a victim's procedural status is not properly formalised (see, for example, Serikov v. Ukraine, no. 42164/09, § 82, 23 July 2015, with numerous further references).
  • EGMR, 13.10.2016 - 47351/06

    TYMCHENKO v. UKRAINE

    Any deficiency in the investigation which undermines its ability to establish the cause of injuries or the identity of the persons responsible will risk falling foul of this standard (see, for example, Serikov v. Ukraine, no. 42164/09, § 78, 23 July 2015).
  • EGMR, 28.03.2017 - 63409/11

    GRIGORYAN AND SERGEYEVA v. UKRAINE

    The Court has previously held that in many situations this procedure imposes unacceptable limitations on the investigation, in particular because the authorities can take only a limited number of procedural steps within it (see, for example, Savitskyy v. Ukraine, no. 38773/05, § 105, 26 July 2012; Yevgeniy Petrenko v. Ukraine, no. 55749/08, § 67, 29 January 2015; and Serikov v. Ukraine, no. 42164/09, § 82, 23 July 2015).
  • EGMR, 16.02.2017 - 18404/07

    DOLGANIN v. UKRAINE

    Therefore, contrary to the Government's submissions, the complaint is not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention (see Serikov v. Ukraine, no. 42164/09, § 53, 23 July 2015).
  • EGMR, 23.06.2016 - 5911/05

    KLEUTIN v. UKRAINE

    Any deficiency in the investigation which undermines its ability to establish the cause of injuries or the identity of the persons responsible will risk falling foul of this standard (see, for example, Serikov v. Ukraine, no. 42164/09, § 78, 23 July 2015).
  • EGMR, 06.09.2016 - 25922/09

    SKANT v. UKRAINE

    It is true that a full-blown criminal investigation was not initiated until 8 November 2009, and before that date the applicant's case was dealt with in the context of a pre-investigation inquiry, a procedure which the Court has on many occasions held to be inadequate (see, for a recent example, Serikov v. Ukraine, no. 42164/09, §§ 82-83, 23 July 2015).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Neu: Die Merklistenfunktion erreichen Sie nun über das Lesezeichen oben.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht