Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 23.09.2003 - 63156/00 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2003,35582) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MIRAILLES contre la FRANCE
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
Partiellement recevable Partiellement irrecevable (französisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MIRAILLES v. FRANCE [Extracts]
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
Partly admissible Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 23.09.2003 - 63156/00
- EGMR, 09.03.2004 - 63156/00
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 20.11.1995 - 17849/91
PRESSOS COMPANIA NAVIERA S.A. ET AUTRES c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2003 - 63156/00
In the final analysis, the Court considers that there is a difference between a mere hope kept alive (rightly or wrongly) by the attitude of the domestic authorities regarding a property development project and a "legitimate expectation" for the purposes of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, which must be more concrete and be based on a statutory provision or legal instrument, such as a final judicial decision (see Pressos Compania Naviera S.A. and Others v. Belgium, judgment of 20 November 1995, Series A no. 332, p. 21, § 31; Beyeler v. Italy [GC], no. 33202/96, § 105, ECHR 2000-I; and Stretch v. the United Kingdom, no. 44277/98, §§ 32-35, 24 June 2003). - EGMR, 23.11.1983 - 8919/80
VAN DER MUSSELE c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2003 - 63156/00
The concept of "possessions", for the purposes of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, applies to "existing possessions" (see Van der Mussele v. Belgium, judgment of 23 November 1983, Series A no. 70, p. 23, § 48), but can also cover assets, including claims, in respect of which an applicant can argue that he has at least a "legitimate expectation" of obtaining effective enjoyment of a property right (see Pine Valley Developments Ltd and Others v. Ireland, judgment of 29 November 1991, Series A no. 222, p. 23, § 51). - EGMR, 29.11.1991 - 12742/87
PINE VALLEY DEVELOPMENTS LTD ET AUTRES c. IRLANDE
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2003 - 63156/00
The concept of "possessions", for the purposes of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, applies to "existing possessions" (see Van der Mussele v. Belgium, judgment of 23 November 1983, Series A no. 70, p. 23, § 48), but can also cover assets, including claims, in respect of which an applicant can argue that he has at least a "legitimate expectation" of obtaining effective enjoyment of a property right (see Pine Valley Developments Ltd and Others v. Ireland, judgment of 29 November 1991, Series A no. 222, p. 23, § 51).