Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KERR v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d, Art. 6 Abs. 2 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 13.05.2003 - 62960/00

  ANTOINE contre le ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2003 - 63356/00

  The Court recalls its recent decision in the case of Antoine v. the United Kingdom ((dec.), no. 62960/00, ECHR 2003-...), in which it found that from the time that the applicant was found by a jury to be unfit to plead the criminal proceedings against him came to an end.
• EGMR, 25.03.1983 - 8660/79

  Minelli ./. Schweiz

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2003 - 63356/00

  Furthermore, the Court does not consider that the jury's findings amounted to an "inference of guilt", so as to bring the proceedings within the scope of Article 6 § 2 (see Minelli v. Switzerland, 25 March 1983, Series A no. 62; Ringvold v. Norway, no. 34964/97, §§ 36-39, ECHR 2003-...).
• EGMR, 27.10.1993 - 14448/88

  DOMBO BEHEER B.V. v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2003 - 63356/00

  However, even assuming that Article 6 were to be applicable, the Court notes that the national authorities enjoy greater latitude in the implementation of measures to ensure fairness in civil than in criminal proceedings (see, for example, Dombo Beheer B.V. v. the Netherlands, judgment of 27 October 1993, Series A no. 274, §§ 32-33, and more recently Suominen v. Finland, no. 37801/97, § 33, 1 July 2003).
• EGMR, 16.07.1971 - 2614/65

  RINGEISEN v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2003 - 63356/00

  The Court notes that the applicant was absolutely discharged and finds that the applicant has not demonstrated how the proceedings involved a "contestation", the outcome of which was decisive for his private rights and obligations (see for example Ringeisen v. Austria, judgment of 16 July 1971, Series A no. 13, § 94, Fayed v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 21 September 1994, Series A no. 294-B, § 56).
• EGMR, 21.09.1994 - 17101/90

  FAYED c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2003 - 63356/00

  The Court notes that the applicant was absolutely discharged and finds that the applicant has not demonstrated how the proceedings involved a "contestation", the outcome of which was decisive for his private rights and obligations (see for example Ringeisen v. Austria, judgment of 16 July 1971, Series A no. 13, § 94, Fayed v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 21 September 1994, Series A no. 294-B, § 56).

• EGMR, 21.06.2016 - 48023/06

  VASENIN v. RUSSIA

  In this connection, they referred to the cases of Antoine v. the United Kingdom ((dec.), no. 62960/00, ECHR 2003) and Kerr v. the United Kingdom ((dec.), no. 63356/00, 23 September 2003).
• EGMR, 04.04.2019 - 28932/14

  HODZIC v. CROATIA

  In some cases concerning the proceedings for involuntary placement of mentally ill offenders in the psychiatric hospital, the Court did not consider that Article 6 § 1 of the Convention applied under its criminal head (see Antoine v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 62960/00, ECHR 2003, and Kerr v. the United Kingdom ((dec.), no. 63356/00, 23 September 2003).
• EGMR, 30.10.2012 - 19936/04

  VALERIY LOPATA v. RUSSIA

  In the latter connection, they referred to the cases of Antoine v. the United Kingdom ((dec.), no. 62960/00, ECHR 2003-...) and Kerr v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 63356/00, 23 September 2003) and maintained that the procedure under section 4A of the 1964 Act was similar in operation to the procedure in the case at hand.