Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GRAYSON ET BARNHAM c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 2, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
  Non-violation de l'art. 6-1 Non-violation de P1-1 (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GRAYSON AND BARNHAM v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 2, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
  No violation of Art. 6-1 No violation of P1-1 (englisch)

• Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte

  (englisch)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

Wird zitiert von ... (10)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 07.10.1988 - 10519/83

  SALABIAKU c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2008 - 19955/05

  While the Convention does not regard such presumptions with indifference, they are not prohibited in principle, as long as States remain within reasonable limits, taking into account the importance of what is at stake and maintaining the rights of the defence (see Salabiaku v. France, judgment of 7 October 1988, Series A no. 141-A, § 28).
• EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13071/87

  EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2008 - 19955/05

  The Court's task is to ascertain whether the proceedings in their entirety, including the way in which evidence was taken, were fair (Edwards v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 6 December 1992, Series A no. 247-B, § 34).
• EGMR, 09.02.1995 - 17440/90

  WELCH v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2008 - 19955/05

  Article 6 § 1, which applies throughout the entirety of proceedings for "the determination of... any criminal charge", including proceedings whereby a sentence is fixed, was therefore applicable (see also Welch v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 9 February 1995, Series A no. 307-A).

• EGMR, 29.10.2013 - 17475/09

  VARVARA v. ITALY

  19955/05 and 15085/06, § 49, 23 September 2008 (relating to the same Act), in which the first applicant had had to pay the £ 1,236,748 confiscated, on threat of an additional eight-year prison sentence, and the second applicant £ 1,460,615, on threat of a prison sentence of five years and three months; and Woolley v. the United Kingdom, no. 28019/10, §§ 80-84, 10 April 2012 (relating to section 75 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 and section 139 of the Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000, in which the applicant had had to serve four years" imprisonment in addition to his sentence because he had failed to pay the £ 497, 784.02 confiscated.
• EGMR, 13.07.2021 - 50705/11

  TODOROV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  The conclusions reached in Phillips were reiterated in Grayson and Barnham v. the United Kingdom (nos. 19955/05 and 15085/06, § 52-53, 23 September 2008).
• EGMR, 03.03.2020 - 69729/12

  FILKIN c. PORTUGAL

  La Cour observe ensuite que la mesure litigieuse a été ordonnée parce que les autorités internes soupçonnaient que la somme qui avait été transférée sur le compte bancaire du requérant provenait d'activités délictueuses, à savoir notamment le trafic de stupéfiants (paragraphe 33 ci-dessus ; pour des affaires similaires, voir Phillips c. Royaume-Uni (no 41087/98, CEDH 2001-VII) et Grayson et Barnham c. Royaume-Uni (nos 19955/05 et 15085/06, 23 septembre 2008)).

 
• EGMR, 10.09.2013 - 663/11

  NEDYALKOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  This means that no issues arise in relation to the presumption of innocence, in so far as protected under that provision as part of the general notion of a fair hearing in criminal proceedings (contrast Phillips v. the United Kingdom, no. 41087/98, §§ 37-47, ECHR 2001-VII, and Grayson and Barnham v. the United Kingdom, nos. 19955/05 and 15085/06, §§ 37-49, 23 September 2008, and see, mutatis mutandis, Walsh v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 43384/05, 21 November 2006).
• EGMR, 13.10.2015 - 3503/08

  ÜNSPED PAKET SERVISI SAN. VE TIC. A.S. v. BULGARIA

  19955/05 and 15085/06, § 45, 23 September 2008).
• EGMR, 04.07.2023 - 41047/19

  THANZA v. ALBANIA

  19955/05 and 15085/06, §§ 41-42, 23 September 2008; and Polyakh and Others v. Ukraine, nos.
• EGMR, 02.05.2017 - 38977/15

  SOFIA v. SAN MARINO

  While the Convention does not regard such presumptions with indifference, they are not prohibited in principle, as long as States remain within reasonable limits, taking into account the importance of what is at stake and maintaining the rights of the defence (see Salabiaku v. France, 7 October 1988, Series A no. 141-A, § 28, and Grayson and Barnham v. the United Kingdom, nos. 19955/05 and 15085/06, § 40, 23 September 2008).
• EGMR, 17.10.2017 - 21400/17

  CAMERINI v. SAN MARINO

  While the Convention does not regard such presumptions with indifference, they are not prohibited in principle, as long as States remain within reasonable limits, taking into account the importance of what is at stake and maintaining the rights of the defence (see Salabiaku v. France, 7 October 1988, Series A no. 141-A, § 28, and Grayson and Barnham v. the United Kingdom, nos. 19955/05 and 15085/06, § 40, 23 September 2008).
• EGMR, 10.11.2009 - 7618/07

  MINHAS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Article 6 § 1, which applies throughout the entirety of proceedings for "the determination of... any criminal charge", including proceedings whereby a sentence is fixed, was therefore applicable (see Phillips v. the United Kingdom, no. 41087/98, § 39, ECHR 2001-VII; and Grayson and Barnham v. the United Kingdom, nos. 19955/05 and 15085/06, § 37, 23 September 2008).
• EGMR, 06.05.2014 - 38759/12

  YOUNG v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Article 6 § 1, which applies throughout the entirety of proceedings for "the determination of... any criminal charge", including proceedings whereby a sentence is fixed, was therefore applicable (see Phillips v. the United Kingdom, no. 41087/98, § 39, ECHR 2001-VII; and Grayson and Barnham v. the United Kingdom, nos. 19955/05 and 15085/06, § 37, 23 September 2008).