Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 23.09.2008 - 50425/99   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2008,37151
EGMR, 23.09.2008 - 50425/99 (https://dejure.org/2008,37151)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 23.09.2008 - 50425/99 (https://dejure.org/2008,37151)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 23. September 2008 - 50425/99 (https://dejure.org/2008,37151)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2008,37151) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (70)Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

  • EGMR, 04.12.2007 - 50003/99

    WOLKENBERG AND OTHERS v. POLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2008 - 50425/99
    Having regard to the decisions to strike the applications Wolkenberg and Others v. Poland (no. 50003/99) and Witkowska-Tobola v. Poland (no. 11208/02) out of the Court's list of cases,.

    The operation of the compensation scheme introduced by the July 2005 Act is described in the Court's decisions given in the cases of Wolkenberg and Others v. Poland (dec.), no. 50003/99, §§ 18-23, ECHR 2007-XIV, and Witkowska-Tobola v. Poland (dec.), no. 11208/02, §§ 22-27, 4 December 2007.

  • EGMR, 04.12.2007 - 11208/02

    WITKOWSKA-TOBOLA v. POLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2008 - 50425/99
    Having regard to the decisions to strike the applications Wolkenberg and Others v. Poland (no. 50003/99) and Witkowska-Tobola v. Poland (no. 11208/02) out of the Court's list of cases,.

    The operation of the compensation scheme introduced by the July 2005 Act is described in the Court's decisions given in the cases of Wolkenberg and Others v. Poland (dec.), no. 50003/99, §§ 18-23, ECHR 2007-XIV, and Witkowska-Tobola v. Poland (dec.), no. 11208/02, §§ 22-27, 4 December 2007.

  • EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 42525/07

    ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    Indeed, the Court's task, as defined by Article 19, that is to "ensure the observance of the engagements undertaken by the High Contracting Parties in the Convention and the Protocols thereto", is not necessarily best achieved by repeating the same findings in a large series of cases (see, mutatis mutandis, E.G. v. Poland (dec.), no. 50425/99, § 27, 23 September 2008).
  • EGMR, 10.03.2015 - 14097/12

    VARGA AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY

    Indeed, the Court's task, as defined by Article 19, that is to "ensure the observance of the engagements undertaken by the High Contracting Parties in the Convention and the Protocols thereto", is not necessarily best achieved by repeating the same findings in a large series of cases (see, mutatis mutandis, E.G. v. Poland (dec.), no. 50425/99, § 27, 23 September 2008).
  • EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 33509/04

    BURDOV v. RUSSIA (No. 2)

    Indeed, the Court's task, as defined by Article 19, that is to "ensure the observance of the engagements undertaken by the High Contracting Parties in the Convention and the Protocols thereto", is not necessarily best achieved by repeating the same findings in large series of cases (see, mutatis mutandis, E.G. v. Poland (dec.), no. 50425/99, § 27, 23 September 2008).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht