Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 23.09.2010 - 33929/03 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,63442) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ALEKSANDR LEONIDOVICH IVANOV v. RUSSIA
Art. 3 MRK
Violation of Art. 3 (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (3) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 10.07.2001 - 33394/96
PRICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2010 - 33929/03
The Court reiterates that for treatment to be regarded as degrading or inhuman for the purposes of Article 3 of the Convention it must attain a minimum level of severity (see Price v. the United Kingdom, no. 33394/96, § 24, ECHR 2001-VII). - EGMR, 19.07.2007 - 36898/03
TREPASHKIN v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2010 - 33929/03
This being so, the Court cannot decide, once and for all, how much personal space should be allocated to a detainee in terms of the Convention (see Trepashkin v. Russia, no. 36898/03, § 92, 19 July 2007).
- EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 57541/09
VALERIY SAMOYLOV v. RUSSIA
Failure on a Government's part to submit such information without a satisfactory explanation may give rise to the drawing of inferences as to the well-foundedness of the applicant's allegations (see, in various contexts, D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 57325/00, § 179, ECHR 2007-IV; Ahmet Özkan and Others v. Turkey, no. 21689/93, § 426, 6 April 2004; Aleksandr Leonidovich Ivanov v. Russia, no. 33929/03, §§ 27-35, 23 September 2010; and Boris Popov v. Russia, no. 23284/04, §§ 65-67, 28 October 2010). - EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 15492/09
SAKHVADZE v. RUSSIA
Failure on a Government's part to submit such information without a satisfactory explanation may give rise to the drawing of inferences as to the plausibility of the applicant's allegations (see, in various contexts, D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 57325/00, § 179, ECHR 2007-IV; Ahmet Özkan and Others v. Turkey, no. 21689/93, § 426, 6 April 2004; Aleksandr Leonidovich Ivanov v. Russia, no. 33929/03, §§ 27-35, 23 September 2010; and Boris Popov v. Russia, no. 23284/04, §§ 65-67, 28 October 2010). - EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 28370/05
VLADIMIR VASILYEV v. RUSSIA
Failure on a Government's part to submit such information without a satisfactory explanation may give rise to the drawing of inferences as to the well-foundedness of the applicant's allegations (see, in various contexts, D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 57325/00, § 179, ECHR 2007-IV; Ahmet Özkan and Others v. Turkey, no. 21689/93, § 426, 6 April 2004; Aleksandr Leonidovich Ivanov v. Russia, no. 33929/03, §§ 27-35, 23 September 2010, and Boris Popov v. Russia, no. 23284/04, §§ 65-67, 28 October 2010).