Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 23.09.2010 - 33929/03   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2010,63442
EGMR, 23.09.2010 - 33929/03 (https://dejure.org/2010,63442)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 23.09.2010 - 33929/03 (https://dejure.org/2010,63442)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 23. September 2010 - 33929/03 (https://dejure.org/2010,63442)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,63442) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

  • EGMR, 10.07.2001 - 33394/96

    PRICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2010 - 33929/03
    The Court reiterates that for treatment to be regarded as degrading or inhuman for the purposes of Article 3 of the Convention it must attain a minimum level of severity (see Price v. the United Kingdom, no. 33394/96, § 24, ECHR 2001-VII).
  • EGMR, 19.07.2007 - 36898/03

    TREPASHKIN v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2010 - 33929/03
    This being so, the Court cannot decide, once and for all, how much personal space should be allocated to a detainee in terms of the Convention (see Trepashkin v. Russia, no. 36898/03, § 92, 19 July 2007).
  • EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 57541/09

    VALERIY SAMOYLOV v. RUSSIA

    Failure on a Government's part to submit such information without a satisfactory explanation may give rise to the drawing of inferences as to the well-foundedness of the applicant's allegations (see, in various contexts, D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 57325/00, § 179, ECHR 2007-IV; Ahmet Özkan and Others v. Turkey, no. 21689/93, § 426, 6 April 2004; Aleksandr Leonidovich Ivanov v. Russia, no. 33929/03, §§ 27-35, 23 September 2010; and Boris Popov v. Russia, no. 23284/04, §§ 65-67, 28 October 2010).
  • EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 15492/09

    SAKHVADZE v. RUSSIA

    Failure on a Government's part to submit such information without a satisfactory explanation may give rise to the drawing of inferences as to the plausibility of the applicant's allegations (see, in various contexts, D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 57325/00, § 179, ECHR 2007-IV; Ahmet Özkan and Others v. Turkey, no. 21689/93, § 426, 6 April 2004; Aleksandr Leonidovich Ivanov v. Russia, no. 33929/03, §§ 27-35, 23 September 2010; and Boris Popov v. Russia, no. 23284/04, §§ 65-67, 28 October 2010).
  • EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 28370/05

    VLADIMIR VASILYEV v. RUSSIA

    Failure on a Government's part to submit such information without a satisfactory explanation may give rise to the drawing of inferences as to the well-foundedness of the applicant's allegations (see, in various contexts, D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 57325/00, § 179, ECHR 2007-IV; Ahmet Özkan and Others v. Turkey, no. 21689/93, § 426, 6 April 2004; Aleksandr Leonidovich Ivanov v. Russia, no. 33929/03, §§ 27-35, 23 September 2010, and Boris Popov v. Russia, no. 23284/04, §§ 65-67, 28 October 2010).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht