Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 62279/09   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2014,26539
EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 62279/09 (https://dejure.org/2014,26539)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 23.09.2014 - 62279/09 (https://dejure.org/2014,26539)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 23. September 2014 - 62279/09 (https://dejure.org/2014,26539)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2014,26539) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    ATIMAN v. TURKEY

    Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 2 Abs. 2, Art. 46, Art. 46 Abs. 2 MRK
    Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Substantive aspect) Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) (englisch)

Sonstiges (2)

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (10)

  • EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 36760/06

    STANEV c. BULGARIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 62279/09
    With a view, however, to helping the respondent State fulfil its obligations under Article 46, the Court may seek to indicate the type of individual and/or general measures that might be taken in order to put an end to the situation it has found to exist (see Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443/96, § 194, ECHR 2004-V; Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, § 148, 17 September 2009; and Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, § 255, ECHR-2012).
  • EGMR, 13.07.2000 - 39221/98

    SCOZZARI ET GIUNTA c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 62279/09
    39221/98 and 41963/98, § 249, ECHR 2000-VIII; and Maestri v. Italy [GC], no. 39748/98, § 47, ECHR 2004-I).
  • EGMR, 20.12.2004 - 50385/99

    MAKARATZIS c. GRECE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 62279/09
    This, however, does not exclude in principle an examination of the applicant's complaints under Article 2, the text of which, read as a whole, demonstrates that it covers not only intentional killing but also the situations where it is permitted to use force which may result, as an unintended outcome, in the deprivation of life (see Ä°lhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93, § 75, ECHR 2000-VII, and Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, § 49, ECHR 2004-XI).
  • EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 52534/09

    TAYDAS v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 62279/09
    In fact, the Court has already examined complaints under this provision where the alleged victim had not died as a result of the impugned conduct (see Camekan v. Turkey, no. 54241/08, §§ 37-40, 28 January 2014; Taydas v. Turkey, no. 52534/09, §§ 25, 26 November 2013; and Peker v. Turkey (no. 2), no. 42136/06, §§ 39-43, 12 April 2011 and the cases cited therein).
  • EGMR, 12.04.2011 - 42136/06

    PEKER v. TURKEY (No. 2)

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 62279/09
    In fact, the Court has already examined complaints under this provision where the alleged victim had not died as a result of the impugned conduct (see Camekan v. Turkey, no. 54241/08, §§ 37-40, 28 January 2014; Taydas v. Turkey, no. 52534/09, §§ 25, 26 November 2013; and Peker v. Turkey (no. 2), no. 42136/06, §§ 39-43, 12 April 2011 and the cases cited therein).
  • EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 10249/03

    Rückwirkende Strafschärfung und Anerkennung des Meistbegünstigungsprinzips als

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 62279/09
    With a view, however, to helping the respondent State fulfil its obligations under Article 46, the Court may seek to indicate the type of individual and/or general measures that might be taken in order to put an end to the situation it has found to exist (see Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443/96, § 194, ECHR 2004-V; Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, § 148, 17 September 2009; and Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, § 255, ECHR-2012).
  • EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 22277/93

    ILHAN c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 62279/09
    This, however, does not exclude in principle an examination of the applicant's complaints under Article 2, the text of which, read as a whole, demonstrates that it covers not only intentional killing but also the situations where it is permitted to use force which may result, as an unintended outcome, in the deprivation of life (see Ä°lhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93, § 75, ECHR 2000-VII, and Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, § 49, ECHR 2004-XI).
  • EGMR, 28.01.2014 - 54241/08

    CAMEKAN c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 62279/09
    In fact, the Court has already examined complaints under this provision where the alleged victim had not died as a result of the impugned conduct (see Camekan v. Turkey, no. 54241/08, §§ 37-40, 28 January 2014; Taydas v. Turkey, no. 52534/09, §§ 25, 26 November 2013; and Peker v. Turkey (no. 2), no. 42136/06, §§ 39-43, 12 April 2011 and the cases cited therein).
  • EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43579/98
    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 62279/09
    In view of the fundamental nature of the right to life, the circumstances in which deprivation of life may be justified must be strictly construed (Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, §§ 93-94, ECHR 2005-VII; see also Makaratzis, cited above, §§ 56-59).
  • EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 24746/94

    HUGH JORDAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 62279/09
    This investigation should be independent, accessible to the victim's family, carried out with reasonable promptness and expedition, effective in the sense that it is capable of leading to a determination of whether the force used in such cases was or was not justified in the circumstances or otherwise unlawful, and afford a sufficient element of public scrutiny of the investigation or its results (see Hugh Jordan v. the United Kingdom, no. 24746/94, §§ 105-109, 4 May 2001, and Tahsin Acar, cited above, §§ 222-224).
  • EGMR, 13.10.2015 - 11327/14

    HAÁSZ AND SZABÓ v. HUNGARY

    In fact, the Court has already examined complaints under this provision where the alleged victim had not died as a result of the impugned conduct (see Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, ECHR 2004-XI, and Atiman v. Turkey, no. 62279/09, 23 September 2014, with further references).
  • EGMR, 18.05.2021 - 42329/11

    BISAR AYHAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

    In fact, the Court has already examined complaints under this provision where the alleged victim had not died as a result of the impugned conduct (see Atiman v. Turkey, no. 62279/09, § 27, 23 September 2014).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht