Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 62279/09 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2014,26539) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Sonstiges (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Atiman v. Turkey
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 27.09.2011 - 62279/09
- EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 62279/09
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Neu Zitiert selbst (10)
- EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 36760/06
STANEV c. BULGARIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 62279/09
With a view, however, to helping the respondent State fulfil its obligations under Article 46, the Court may seek to indicate the type of individual and/or general measures that might be taken in order to put an end to the situation it has found to exist (see Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443/96, § 194, ECHR 2004-V; Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, § 148, 17 September 2009; and Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, § 255, ECHR-2012). - EGMR, 13.07.2000 - 39221/98
SCOZZARI ET GIUNTA c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 20.12.2004 - 50385/99
MAKARATZIS c. GRECE
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 62279/09
This, however, does not exclude in principle an examination of the applicant's complaints under Article 2, the text of which, read as a whole, demonstrates that it covers not only intentional killing but also the situations where it is permitted to use force which may result, as an unintended outcome, in the deprivation of life (see Ä°lhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93, § 75, ECHR 2000-VII, and Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, § 49, ECHR 2004-XI).
- EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 52534/09
TAYDAS v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 62279/09
In fact, the Court has already examined complaints under this provision where the alleged victim had not died as a result of the impugned conduct (see Camekan v. Turkey, no. 54241/08, §§ 37-40, 28 January 2014; Taydas v. Turkey, no. 52534/09, §§ 25, 26 November 2013; and Peker v. Turkey (no. 2), no. 42136/06, §§ 39-43, 12 April 2011 and the cases cited therein). - EGMR, 12.04.2011 - 42136/06
PEKER v. TURKEY (No. 2)
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 62279/09
In fact, the Court has already examined complaints under this provision where the alleged victim had not died as a result of the impugned conduct (see Camekan v. Turkey, no. 54241/08, §§ 37-40, 28 January 2014; Taydas v. Turkey, no. 52534/09, §§ 25, 26 November 2013; and Peker v. Turkey (no. 2), no. 42136/06, §§ 39-43, 12 April 2011 and the cases cited therein). - EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 10249/03
Rückwirkende Strafschärfung und Anerkennung des Meistbegünstigungsprinzips als …
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 62279/09
With a view, however, to helping the respondent State fulfil its obligations under Article 46, the Court may seek to indicate the type of individual and/or general measures that might be taken in order to put an end to the situation it has found to exist (see Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443/96, § 194, ECHR 2004-V; Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, § 148, 17 September 2009; and Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, § 255, ECHR-2012). - EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 22277/93
ILHAN c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 62279/09
This, however, does not exclude in principle an examination of the applicant's complaints under Article 2, the text of which, read as a whole, demonstrates that it covers not only intentional killing but also the situations where it is permitted to use force which may result, as an unintended outcome, in the deprivation of life (see Ä°lhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93, § 75, ECHR 2000-VII, and Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, § 49, ECHR 2004-XI). - EGMR, 28.01.2014 - 54241/08
CAMEKAN c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 62279/09
In fact, the Court has already examined complaints under this provision where the alleged victim had not died as a result of the impugned conduct (see Camekan v. Turkey, no. 54241/08, §§ 37-40, 28 January 2014; Taydas v. Turkey, no. 52534/09, §§ 25, 26 November 2013; and Peker v. Turkey (no. 2), no. 42136/06, §§ 39-43, 12 April 2011 and the cases cited therein). - EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43579/98
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 62279/09
In view of the fundamental nature of the right to life, the circumstances in which deprivation of life may be justified must be strictly construed (Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, §§ 93-94, ECHR 2005-VII; see also Makaratzis, cited above, §§ 56-59). - EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 24746/94
HUGH JORDAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 62279/09
This investigation should be independent, accessible to the victim's family, carried out with reasonable promptness and expedition, effective in the sense that it is capable of leading to a determination of whether the force used in such cases was or was not justified in the circumstances or otherwise unlawful, and afford a sufficient element of public scrutiny of the investigation or its results (see Hugh Jordan v. the United Kingdom, no. 24746/94, §§ 105-109, 4 May 2001, and Tahsin Acar, cited above, §§ 222-224).
- EGMR, 13.10.2015 - 11327/14
HAÁSZ AND SZABÓ v. HUNGARY
In fact, the Court has already examined complaints under this provision where the alleged victim had not died as a result of the impugned conduct (see Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, ECHR 2004-XI, and Atiman v. Turkey, no. 62279/09, 23 September 2014, with further references). - EGMR, 18.05.2021 - 42329/11
BISAR AYHAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
In fact, the Court has already examined complaints under this provision where the alleged victim had not died as a result of the impugned conduct (see Atiman v. Turkey, no. 62279/09, § 27, 23 September 2014).