Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 6523/12   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2014,29790
EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 6523/12 (https://dejure.org/2014,29790)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 23.09.2014 - 6523/12 (https://dejure.org/2014,29790)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 23. September 2014 - 6523/12 (https://dejure.org/2014,29790)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2014,29790) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (11)

  • EGMR, 15.02.2011 - 4704/04

    PALIC v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 6523/12
    Due to the lapse of time, the level of urgency may have diminished; the immediacy of required investigative steps in the aftermath of an incident is likely to be absent (e.g. Brecknell, cited above, paras. 79-81. The standard of expedition in such historical cases is much different from the standard applicable in recent incidents where time is often of the essence in preserving vital evidence at a scene and questioning witnesses when their memories are fresh and detailed (see Emin and Others v Cyprus, no. 59623/08 et al, (dec.) 3 April 2012; see also Palic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 4704/04, § 70, 15 February 2011 concerning complex post-conflict situations; Mujkanovic v Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 47063/08, (dec.) 3 June 2014, § 41).

    16064/90, 16065/90, 16066/90, 16068/90, 16069/90, 16070/90, 16071/90, 16072/90 and 16073/90, §§ 161, 192, ECHR 2009; Palic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, cited above, no. 4704/04, § 49, 15 February 2011; Fazlic v Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 66758/09, (dec.) 3 June 2014, § 39).

  • EGMR, 04.01.2007 - 18727/06

    SZULA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 6523/12
    There is no right however to obtain a prosecution or conviction (e.g. Szula v. the United Kingdom, (dec.) no. 18727/06, 4 January 2007) and the fact that an investigation ends without concrete, or with only limited, results is not indicative of any failings as such.
  • EGMR, 10.07.2001 - 25657/94

    AVSAR c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 6523/12
    The obligation is of means only, not result (Avsar v. Turkey, no. 25657/94, § 394, ECHR 2001-VII (extracts)).
  • EGMR, 19.05.2005 - 28079/04

    GREEN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 6523/12
    The Court notes that the procedural obligation under Article 2 does not require applicants to have access to police files, or copies of all documents during an ongoing inquiry, or for them to be consulted or informed about every step (McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, ECHR 2001-III, § 121; Green v. the United Kingdom, no. 28079/04, (dec.) 19 May 2005; Hackett v. the United Kingdom, (dec.) 34698/04, 10 May 2005).
  • EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

    McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 6523/12
    Insofar as the applicants complained about an alleged lack of effective investigation into the killings, the Court's case-law establishes that the obligation to protect the right to life under this provision, read in conjunction with the State's general duty under Article 1 of the Convention to "secure to everyone within their jurisdiction the rights and freedoms defined in [the] Convention", requires by implication that there should be some form of effective official investigation when individuals have been killed as a result of the use of force by, inter alios, agents of the State (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, § 161, Series A no. 324).
  • EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30562/04

    S. und Marper ./. Vereinigtes Königreich

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 6523/12
    30562/04 and 30566/04, ECHR 2008 in which a violation was found due to storage and retention of samples and DNA profiles taken from the applicants without their consent as suspects of offences.
  • EGMR, 10.05.2005 - 34698/04

    HACKETT v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 6523/12
    The Court notes that the procedural obligation under Article 2 does not require applicants to have access to police files, or copies of all documents during an ongoing inquiry, or for them to be consulted or informed about every step (McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, ECHR 2001-III, § 121; Green v. the United Kingdom, no. 28079/04, (dec.) 19 May 2005; Hackett v. the United Kingdom, (dec.) 34698/04, 10 May 2005).
  • EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30566/04
    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 6523/12
    30562/04 and 30566/04, ECHR 2008 in which a violation was found due to storage and retention of samples and DNA profiles taken from the applicants without their consent as suspects of offences.
  • EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 28883/95

    McKERR c. ROYAUME-UNI

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 6523/12
    The Court notes that the procedural obligation under Article 2 does not require applicants to have access to police files, or copies of all documents during an ongoing inquiry, or for them to be consulted or informed about every step (McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, ECHR 2001-III, § 121; Green v. the United Kingdom, no. 28079/04, (dec.) 19 May 2005; Hackett v. the United Kingdom, (dec.) 34698/04, 10 May 2005).
  • EGMR, 03.06.2014 - 66758/09

    FAZLIC AND OTHERS v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 6523/12
    16064/90, 16065/90, 16066/90, 16068/90, 16069/90, 16070/90, 16071/90, 16072/90 and 16073/90, §§ 161, 192, ECHR 2009; Palic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, cited above, no. 4704/04, § 49, 15 February 2011; Fazlic v Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 66758/09, (dec.) 3 June 2014, § 39).
  • EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43579/98
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht