Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 66095/09   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2014,26538
EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 66095/09 (https://dejure.org/2014,26538)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 23.09.2014 - 66095/09 (https://dejure.org/2014,26538)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 23. September 2014 - 66095/09 (https://dejure.org/2014,26538)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2014,26538) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    O.G. v. LATVIA

    Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. b, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. e, Art. 5 Abs. 4 MRK
    Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Take proceedings) Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1-b - Lawful order of a court Article 5-1-e - Persons of unsound mind) ...

Sonstiges (2)

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

  • EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 36760/06

    STANEV c. BULGARIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 66095/09
    In its case-law the Court has set out three minimum conditions which have to be satisfied in order for there to be "the lawful detention of a person of unsound mind" within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 (e): except in emergency cases, the individual concerned must be reliably shown to be of unsound mind, that is to say the existence of a true mental disorder must be established by a competent authority on the basis of objective medical opinion; the mental disorder must be of a kind or degree warranting compulsory confinement; and the validity of continued confinement depends upon the persistence of such a disorder (see, for example, Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, § 145, ECHR 2012, Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, cited above, § 39, and L.M. v. Latvia, no. 26000/02, § 46, 19 July 2011).
  • EGMR, 22.02.1989 - 11152/84

    CIULLA v. ITALY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 66095/09
    That case is therefore to be seen as pertaining more to non- compliance with a court order, considering that the Court has previously held that the phrase "obligation prescribed by law" denotes an obligation of a specific and concrete nature already incumbent on the person concerned (see Ciulla v. Italy, 22 February 1989, § 36, Series A no. 148).
  • EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 31365/96

    VARBANOV v. BULGARIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 66095/09
    A medical opinion cannot be seen as sufficient to justify deprivation of liberty if a significant period of time has elapsed (see Varbanov v. Bulgaria, no. 31365/96, § 47, ECHR 2000-X, and Raudevs v. Latvia, cited above, § 72).
  • EGMR, 24.10.1979 - 6301/73

    WINTERWERP v. THE NETHERLANDS

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 66095/09
    This objective, and the broader condition that detention be "in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law", require the existence in domestic law of adequate legal protection and fair and proper procedures (see Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, 24 October 1979, § 45, Series A no. 33).
  • EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 71503/01

    ASSANIDZE v. GEORGIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2014 - 66095/09
    Turning next to the question of whether the order of the Riga Regional Court was "lawful", it is necessary to verify if it was compatible with the essential objective of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention, which is to prevent individuals being deprived of their liberty in an arbitrary fashion (see Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503/01, § 170, ECHR 2004-II, and H.L. v. the United Kingdom, no. 45508/99, § 115, ECHR 2004-IX).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht