Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 23.10.2001 - 24244/94 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2001,45246) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MIGON v. POLAND
Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. c, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 4 MRK
Partly admissible Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 23.10.2001 - 24244/94
- EGMR, 25.06.2002 - 24244/94
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 10.11.1969 - 1602/62
Stögmüller ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2001 - 24244/94
The persistence of reasonable suspicion that the person arrested has committed an offence is a condition sine qua non for the validity of the continued detention (see the Stögmüller v. Austria judgment of 10 November 1969, Series A no. 9, p. 40, § 4), but, after a certain lapse of time, it no longer suffices; the Court must then establish whether the other grounds cited by the judicial authorities continue to justify the deprivation of liberty. - EGMR, 27.06.1968 - 1936/63
Neumeister ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2001 - 24244/94
It is essentially on the basis of the reasons given in these decisions and of the true facts mentioned by the applicant in his appeals, that the Court is called upon to decide whether or not there has been a violation of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention (see, inter alia, the Neumeister v. Austria judgment of 27 June 1968, Series A no. 8, p. 37, §§ 4-5). - EGMR, 26.01.1993 - 14379/88
W. c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2001 - 24244/94
Where such grounds are "relevant" and "sufficient", the Court must also ascertain whether the competent national authorities displayed "special diligence" in the conduct of the proceedings (see the W. v. Switzerland judgment of 26 January 1993, Series A no. 254-A, p. 15, § 30). - EGMR, 30.03.1989 - 10444/83
LAMY c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2001 - 24244/94
It was true that the domestic law at that time allowed the prosecutor to refuse access to the case-file until the end of the investigations, but this very regulation ran counter to the requirements of the Convention, in particular those formulated by the Court in its Lamy v. Belgium judgment of 30 March 1989 (Series A no. 151).