Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  FLUX AND SAMSON v. MOLDOVA

  Art. 10 MRK
  Violation of Art. 10 (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 20.05.1999 - 21980/93

  BLADET TROMSØ ET STENSAAS c. NORVEGE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2007 - 28700/03

  In view of the above, the Court is satisfied of the newspaper's good faith and that it had acted in consonance with principles of responsible journalism (see Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, § 63, ECHR 1999-III), albeit resorting to "a degree of exaggeration or even provocation", which had to be protected (see Prager and Oberschlick v. Austria, judgment of 26 April 1995, Series A no. 313, § 38).
• EGMR, 29.03.2001 - 38432/97

  THOMA v. LUXEMBOURG

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2007 - 28700/03

  The Court reiterates that "punishment of a journalist for assisting in the dissemination of statements made by another person... would seriously hamper the contribution of the press to discussion of matters of public interest and should not be envisaged unless there are particularly strong reasons for doing so" (see Jersild v. Denmark, judgment of 23 September 1994, Series A no. 298, § 35; and Thoma v. Luxembourg, no. 38432/97, § 62, ECHR 2001-III).
• EGMR, 20.04.2004 - 60115/00

  Meinungsfreiheit von Rechtsanwälten bei der öffentlichen Kritik von …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2007 - 28700/03

  The Court reiterates that in order for costs and expenses to be included in an award under Article 41 of the Convention, it must be established that they were actually and necessarily incurred and are reasonable as to quantum (see, for example, Amihalachioaie v. Moldova, no. 60115/00, § 47, ECHR 2004-III).

 
• EGMR, 08.07.2004 - 48787/99

  Transnistrien

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2007 - 28700/03

  In any event, the Court has always awarded costs and expenses in situations where the fees were not paid by the applicants to their lawyers before the Court's judgment (see, among other authorities, Ilascu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787/99, § 493, ECHR 2004-VII, and Christian Democratic People's Party v. Moldova, no. 28793/02, § 85, ECHR 2006-...).
• EGMR, 14.02.2006 - 28793/02

  CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S PARTY v. MOLDOVA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2007 - 28700/03

  In any event, the Court has always awarded costs and expenses in situations where the fees were not paid by the applicants to their lawyers before the Court's judgment (see, among other authorities, Ilascu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787/99, § 493, ECHR 2004-VII, and Christian Democratic People's Party v. Moldova, no. 28793/02, § 85, ECHR 2006-...).
• EGMR, 26.04.1995 - 15974/90

  PRAGER ET OBERSCHLICK c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2007 - 28700/03

  In view of the above, the Court is satisfied of the newspaper's good faith and that it had acted in consonance with principles of responsible journalism (see Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, § 63, ECHR 1999-III), albeit resorting to "a degree of exaggeration or even provocation", which had to be protected (see Prager and Oberschlick v. Austria, judgment of 26 April 1995, Series A no. 313, § 38).
• EGMR, 23.09.1994 - 15890/89

  JERSILD v. DENMARK

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2007 - 28700/03

  The Court reiterates that "punishment of a journalist for assisting in the dissemination of statements made by another person... would seriously hamper the contribution of the press to discussion of matters of public interest and should not be envisaged unless there are particularly strong reasons for doing so" (see Jersild v. Denmark, judgment of 23 September 1994, Series A no. 298, § 35; and Thoma v. Luxembourg, no. 38432/97, § 62, ECHR 2001-III).
• EGMR, 26.04.1979 - 6538/74

  SUNDAY TIMES c. ROYAUME-UNI (N° 1)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2007 - 28700/03

  The Court refers to the applicable general principles as established in its jurisprudence regarding freedom of expression (see, among many other authorities, Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 1), judgment of 26 April 1979, Series A no. 30; Busuioc v. Moldova, no. 61513/00, 21 December 2004; and Savitchi v. Moldova, no. 11039/02, 11 October 2005).

• EGMR, 08.03.2016 - 25721/04

  RUSU v. ROMANIA

  [1] The term "responsible journalism" was used in 2007 in Flux and Samson v. Moldova, no. 28700/03, 23 October 2007 to explain what is said in Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, § 63, ECHR 1999-III).