Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 27995/05

The Court reiterates that Article 13 guarantees an effective remedy before a national authority for a prolonged non-enforcement of a binding judgment (see, mutatis mutandis, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 156, ECHR 2000-XI).

Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 27995/05

The Court reiterates that an unreasonably long delay in the enforcement of a binding judgment may breach the Convention (see Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, ECHR 2002-III).

Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 27995/05

To decide if the delay was reasonable, the Court will look at how complex the enforcement proceedings were, how the applicant and the authorities behaved, and what the nature of the award was (see Raylyan v. Russia, no. 22000/03, § 31, 15 February 2007).

Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 27995/05

As to the applicability of Article 6, the Court reiterates that this Article does not apply to cases where domestic law expressly excludes access to a court for the category of staff in question, and where this exclusion is justified by the State's objective interest (see Vilho Eskelinen and Others v. Finland [GC], no. 63235/00, § 62, ECHR 2007-...).

Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 27995/05

Accordingly, Article 6 is applicable (compare with Dovguchits v. Russia, no. 2999/03, § 24, 7 June 2007), and the Government's objection must be dismissed.