Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 6017/11 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,55575) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Neu Zitiert selbst (1)
- EGMR, 25.10.1990 - 11787/85
THYNNE, WILSON AND GUNNELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 6017/11
Further, in the present case the applicant has not shown that the grounds relied on by the Appeals Chamber when deciding the length of sentence to impose on him were by their nature susceptible of change with the passage of time (compare Weeks, cited above, § 58; Thynne, Wilson and Gunnell v. the United Kingdom, 25 October 1990, § 76, Series A no. 190-A; and Stafford, cited above, § 87)).
- EGMR, 30.01.2018 - 18233/16
ETUTE c. LUXEMBOURG
In another important case, Krajisnik v. the United Kingdom ((dec.), no. 6017/11, 23 October 2012), the Court dealt not with "renewed" but with "continuing" imprisonment.[44] Krajisnik c. Royaume-Uni (déc), n° 6017/11, 23 octobre 2012.
- EGMR, 08.01.2013 - 43759/10
WILLCOX AND HURFORD v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
It has previously indicated that arbitrariness may arise where there has been an element of bad faith or deception on the part of the authorities; where the order to detain and the execution of the detention did not genuinely conform with the purpose of the restrictions permitted by the relevant sub-paragraph of Article 5 § 1; where there was no connection between the ground of permitted deprivation of liberty relied on and the place and conditions of detention; and where there was no relationship of proportionality between the ground of detention relied upon and the detention in question (see Krajisnik v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 6017/11, § 53, 23 October 2012.