Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 23.10.2018 - 61689/16, 20421/17, 23188/17, 37702/17 |
Zitiervorschläge
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 23.10.2018 - 61689/16, 20421/17, 23188/17, 37702/17 (https://dejure.org/2018,33969)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 23. Oktober 2018 - 61689/16, 20421/17, 23188/17, 37702/17 (https://dejure.org/2018,33969)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2018,33969) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
A.N. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Extradition) (Conditional) (Tajikistan);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Extradition) (Conditional) (Uzbekistan);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
A.N. v. RUSSIA and 3 other applications
Art. 3 MRK
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 25.04.2013 - 71386/10
SAVRIDDIN DZHURAYEV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2018 - 61689/16
The relevant domestic and international law is summarised in the Court's judgments on removals from Russia to Tajikistan and Uzbekistan (see Savriddin Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 71386/10, §§ 70-101, ECHR 2013 (extracts), and Akram Karimov v. Russia, no. 62892/12, §§ 69-105, 28 May 2014). - EGMR, 28.05.2014 - 62892/12
AKRAM KARIMOV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2018 - 61689/16
The relevant domestic and international law is summarised in the Court's judgments on removals from Russia to Tajikistan and Uzbekistan (see Savriddin Dzhurayev v. Russia, no. 71386/10, §§ 70-101, ECHR 2013 (extracts), and Akram Karimov v. Russia, no. 62892/12, §§ 69-105, 28 May 2014). - EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CÂMPEANU v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2018 - 61689/16
However, having regard to the facts of the case, the submissions of the parties and its findings under Article 5 of the Convention, the Court considers that it has examined the main legal questions raised in the present application and that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the remaining complaints (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014, with further references). - EGMR, 02.03.2017 - 59727/13
AHMED v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2018 - 61689/16
A detention period subject to review at regular intervals, as long as expulsion remains a realistic possibility, might be reasonable given the authorities" decisions to maintain that detention awaiting the outcome of this Court's judgment (see Ahmed v. the United Kingdom, no. 59727/13, §§ 45-59, 2 March 2017).
- EGMR, 19.03.2024 - 27584/20
K.J. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Merits The case of K.J. 92. K.J. relied on the violations found by the Court in Azimov v. Russia (cited above, §§ 152 and 171-73); Kim v. Russia (no. 44260/13, §§ 41-57, 17 July 2014); and A.N. and Others v. Russia ([Committee], no. 61689/16 and 3 others, § 34, 23 October 2018).