Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 23.11.1999 - 26507/95 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1999,36274) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MÜLLER, FEICHTER, FRÖHLICH, BECHTOLD, BÖCKLE AND KÜHNE v. AUSTRIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 14, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Kurzfassungen/Presse
- RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (8)
- EGMR, 21.09.1993 - 12235/86
ZUMTOBEL v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.11.1999 - 26507/95
Moreover, such a procedural rule did not infringe Article 6 of the Convention as the European Court of Human Rights had stated in its Zumtobel v. Austria judgment of 12 September 1993 (Series A no. 268-A).In its previous case- law the Court has accepted that disputes concerning such matters involve a determination of an applicant's civil rights and obligations within the meaning of Article 6 of the Convention (see the Bodén v. Sweden judgment of 27 October 1987, Series A no. 125-B, pp. 39-41, §§ 28-32, and the Zumtobel v. Austria judgment of 12 September 1993, Series A no. 268-A, p. 13-14, §§ 31-32).
- EGMR, 13.06.1979 - 6833/74
MARCKX v. BELGIUM
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.11.1999 - 26507/95
Although the application of Article 14 does not presuppose a breach of such provisions - and to this extent it is autonomous - there can be no room for its application unless the facts at issue fall within the ambit of one or more of the latter (see the Marckx v. Belgium judgment of 13 June 1979, Series A no. 31, p. 23, § 50, and the Karlheinz Schmidt v. Germany judgment of 18 July 1994, Series A no. 291-B, p. 32, § 22). - EGMR, 19.04.1994 - 16034/90
VAN DE HURK v. THE NETHERLANDS
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.11.1999 - 26507/95
Nor are the Convention organs called upon to examine whether arguments have been adequately met (see the Van de Hurk v. Netherlands judgment of 19 April 1994, Series A no. 288, p. 20, § 61, and the Ruiz Torija v. Spain judgment of 9 December 1994, Series A no. 303- A, p. 12, § 29).
- EGMR, 18.07.1994 - 13580/88
KARLHEINZ SCHMIDT v. GERMANY
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.11.1999 - 26507/95
Although the application of Article 14 does not presuppose a breach of such provisions - and to this extent it is autonomous - there can be no room for its application unless the facts at issue fall within the ambit of one or more of the latter (see the Marckx v. Belgium judgment of 13 June 1979, Series A no. 31, p. 23, § 50, and the Karlheinz Schmidt v. Germany judgment of 18 July 1994, Series A no. 291-B, p. 32, § 22). - EKMR, 09.05.1986 - 11628/85
LINDE v. SWEDEN
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.11.1999 - 26507/95
A future income constitutes a "possession" only if it has been earned or where an enforceable claim exists (see the Marckx v. Belgium judgment, loc. cit.; the van der Mussele v. Belgium judgment 23 November 1983, Series A no. 70, p. 23, § 48; No. 10438/83, Dec. 3.10.84, D.R. 41, p. 226; No. 11628/85, Dec. 9.5.86, D.R. 47, p. 270). - EGMR, 27.10.1987 - 10930/84
BODÉN v. SWEDEN
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.11.1999 - 26507/95
In its previous case- law the Court has accepted that disputes concerning such matters involve a determination of an applicant's civil rights and obligations within the meaning of Article 6 of the Convention (see the Bodén v. Sweden judgment of 27 October 1987, Series A no. 125-B, pp. 39-41, §§ 28-32, and the Zumtobel v. Austria judgment of 12 September 1993, Series A no. 268-A, p. 13-14, §§ 31-32). - EGMR, 23.11.1983 - 8919/80
VAN DER MUSSELE c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.11.1999 - 26507/95
A future income constitutes a "possession" only if it has been earned or where an enforceable claim exists (see the Marckx v. Belgium judgment, loc. cit.; the van der Mussele v. Belgium judgment 23 November 1983, Series A no. 70, p. 23, § 48; No. 10438/83, Dec. 3.10.84, D.R. 41, p. 226; No. 11628/85, Dec. 9.5.86, D.R. 47, p. 270). - EKMR, 03.10.1984 - 10438/83
BATELAAN et HUIGES c. PAYS-BAS
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.11.1999 - 26507/95
A future income constitutes a "possession" only if it has been earned or where an enforceable claim exists (see the Marckx v. Belgium judgment, loc. cit.; the van der Mussele v. Belgium judgment 23 November 1983, Series A no. 70, p. 23, § 48; No. 10438/83, Dec. 3.10.84, D.R. 41, p. 226; No. 11628/85, Dec. 9.5.86, D.R. 47, p. 270).