Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 23.11.1999 - 46290/99 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1999,33382) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
A.J.D. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 26.03.1982 - 8269/78
Adolf ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.11.1999 - 46290/99
The Court finds that in the circumstances of this case any defects in the original trial were remedied by the subsequent proceedings before the Court of Appeal (see, in this respect, the Adolf v. Austria judgment of 26 March 1982, Series A no. 49, pp. 17-18, §§ 38-41). - EGMR, 06.12.1988 - 10588/83
BARBERÀ, MESSEGUÉ AND JABARDO v. SPAIN
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.11.1999 - 46290/99
The Court must however determine whether the proceedings considered as a whole, including the way in which prosecution and defence evidence was taken, were fair as required by Article 6 § 1 (see Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v. Spain judgment, judgment of 6 December 1988, Series A no. 146, p. 31, § 68). - EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13071/87
EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.11.1999 - 46290/99
In its Edwards v. the United Kingdom judgment of 16 December 1992 (Series A no. 247-B, § 34) the Court stated that in considering whether proceedings had been unfair:. - EGMR, 22.04.1992 - 12351/86
VIDAL c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.11.1999 - 46290/99
The Court's task is to ascertain whether the proceedings in their entirety, including the way in which evidence was taken, were fair (see, inter alia, the Vidal v. Belgium judgment of 22 April 1992, Series A no. 235-B, pp. 32-33, § 33)".