Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  HAARDE v. ICELAND

  Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Criminal charge;Impartial tribunal;Independent tribunal);No violation of Article ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  HAARDE v. ICELAND - [Deutsche Übersetzung] Zusammenfassung durch das Österreichische Institut für Menschenrechte (ÖIM)

  [DEU] Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Criminal charge;Fair hearing;Impartial tribunal;Independent tribunal);No ...

• juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  HAARDE v. ICELAND

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. a, Art. 7, Art. 7 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 10.02.1995 - 15175/89

  ALLENET DE RIBEMONT c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.11.2017 - 66847/12

  The principle of the presumption of innocence may be infringed not only by a judge or court but also by other public authorities and representatives of the State, including prosecutors (see, among other authorities, Allenet de Ribemont v. France, 10 February 1995, §§ 35 and 36, Series A no. 308; and Kemal Coskun v. Turkey, no. 45028/07, §§ 41 and 42, 28 March 2017).
• EGMR, 17.12.2013 - 20688/04

  NIKOLOVA ET VANDOVA c. BULGARIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.11.2017 - 66847/12

  Furthermore, the principle of equality of arms - one of the elements of the broader concept of a fair trial - requires a "fair balance between the parties": each party is to be given a reasonable opportunity to present his case under conditions that do not place him at a substantial disadvantage vis-à-vis his opponent (see, for example, Matyjek v. Poland (dec.), no. 38184/03, § 55, ECHR 2006-VII, and Nikolova and Vandova v. Bulgaria, no. 20688/04, § 91, 17 December 2013).
• EGMR, 18.05.1999 - 28972/95

  NINN-HANSEN c. DANEMARK

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.11.2017 - 66847/12

  Referring, inter alia, to the case of Ninn-Hansen v. Denmark ((dec.), no. 28972/95, ECHR 1999-V), they asserted therefore that the proceedings before the PRC had been part of the investigative stage and had not been concerned with a "determination of the charge".
• EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94

  PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.11.2017 - 66847/12

  Additionally, sub-paragraphs (a) and (b) of Article 6 § 3 are connected and the right to be informed of the nature and the cause of the accusation must be considered in the light of a defendant's right to prepare his defence (seem for instance, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, §§ 52 and 54, ECHR 1999-II).
• EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 35343/05

  VASILIAUSKAS c. LITUANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.11.2017 - 66847/12

  Article 7 of the Convention cannot be read as outlawing the gradual clarification of the rules of criminal liability through judicial interpretation from case to case, provided that the resultant development is consistent with the essence of the offence and could reasonably be foreseen (see Vasiliauskas v. Lithuania [GC], no. 35343/05, § 153-155, ECHR 2015, with further references).

• EGMR, 18.10.2018 - 80018/12

  THIAM c. FRANCE

  L'inamovibilité des juges en cours de mandat est généralement considérée comme un corollaire de leur indépendance et, partant, comme l'une des exigences de l'article 6 § 1 (Campbell et Fell c. Royaume-Uni, 28 juin 1984, § 78, série A no 80, Maktouf et Damjanovic c. Bosnie-Herzégovine [GC], nos 2312/08 et 34179/08, § 49, CEDH 2013 (extraits) et Haarde c. Islande, no 66847/12, § 103, 23 novembre 2017).
• EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 19750/13

  GROSAM v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  The Court has consistently held that the participation on tribunals of members without legal qualifications is not, as such, contrary to Article 6 (see, for instance, Haarde v. Iceland, no. 66847/12, §§ 103-08, 23 November 2017, regarding criminal proceedings conducted - at first and only instance - before a tribunal where the majority of the members were lay judges; see also Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v. Belgium, 23 June 1981, §§ 57-58, Series A no. 43, and Pabla Ky v. Finland, no. 47221/99, § 32, ECHR 2004-V).
• EGMR, 14.06.2022 - 20837/18

  ALEXANDRU-RADU LUCA v. ROMANIA

  For instance, the evidence obtained during this stage often determines the framework in which the offence charged will be considered at the trial (see Ibrahim and Others, cited above, § 253, with further references, and Haarde v. Iceland, no. 66847/12, § 78, 23 November 2017).