Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 13418/03 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,3045) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
DMITRIYEV v. RUSSIA
Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 8 MRK
No violation of Art. 3 (substantive aspect) Violation of Art. 3 (procedural aspect) Violation of Art. 5 Violation of Art. 8 (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Dmitriyev v. Russia
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23763/94
TANRIKULU c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 13418/03
It must then examine whether, in all the circumstances of the case, the applicant did everything that could reasonably be expected of him or her to exhaust domestic remedies (see Akdivar and Others, cited above, § 69; Aksoy, cited above, §§ 53-54; and Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 82, ECHR 1999-IV). - EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 57948/00
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 13418/03
The minimum standards of "effectiveness" defined by the Court's case-law also require that the investigation must be independent, impartial and subject to public scrutiny, and that the competent authorities must act with exemplary diligence and promptness (see Isayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 57947/00, 57948/00 and 57949/00, §§ 208-13, 24 February 2005, and Menesheva v. Russia, no. 59261/00, § 67, ECHR 2006-III). - EGMR, 09.03.2006 - 59261/00
MENECHEVA c. RUSSIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 13418/03
The minimum standards of "effectiveness" defined by the Court's case-law also require that the investigation must be independent, impartial and subject to public scrutiny, and that the competent authorities must act with exemplary diligence and promptness (see Isayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 57947/00, 57948/00 and 57949/00, §§ 208-13, 24 February 2005, and Menesheva v. Russia, no. 59261/00, § 67, ECHR 2006-III). - EGMR, 24.06.2008 - 28940/95
FOKA v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 13418/03
In view of the above circumstances, the Court finds that the applicant's arrest and subsequent detention constituted a deprivation of liberty within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 (see Gillan and Quinton v. the United Kingdom, no. 4158/05, § 57, ECHR 2010-... (extracts), and Foka v. Turkey, no. 28940/95, §§ 74-79, 24 June 2008). - EGMR, 22.09.1993 - 15473/89
KLAAS c. ALLEMAGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 13418/03
Allegations of ill-treatment must be supported by appropriate evidence (see, mutatis mutandis, Klaas v. Germany, 22 September 1993, § 30, Series A no. 269).
- EGMR, 26.05.2020 - 1441/10
RAMAZANOVA ET ALEKSEYEV c. RUSSIE
Compte tenu de ces considérations, elle ne peut pas conclure à l'existence de l'ingérence alléguée (voir, a contrario, Aleksandra Dmitriyeva c. Russie, no 9390/05, § 103, 3 novembre 2011, et Dmitriyev c. Russie, no 13418/03, § 94, 24 janvier 2012).