Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 66399/09 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,15033) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
S.v. v. FINLAND
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 14, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94
Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 66399/09
In this way, it is an important aspect of the principle that the machinery of protection established by the Convention is subsidiary to the national systems safeguarding human rights (see the recapitulation of the relevant case-law in Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 74, ECHR 1999-V). - EGMR, 22.05.2001 - 33592/96
BAUMANN v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 66399/09
However, this rule is subject to exceptions which may be justified by the particular circumstances of each case (see Baumann v. France, no. 33592/96, § 47, ECHR 2001-V (extracts)). - EGMR, 05.09.2002 - 77784/01
NOGOLICA c. CROATIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 66399/09
The Court has on many occasions held in cases concerning the length of proceedings, and which had not been declared admissible by the Court, that applicants should be required to have recourse to domestic remedies notwithstanding that those remedies have been enacted after their applications have been filed with the Court (see, for example, Giacometti and Others v. Italy (dec.), no. 34939/97, ECHR 2001-XII; Nogolica v. Croatia (dec.), no. 77784/01, ECHR 2002-VIII; Andrásik and Others v. Slovakia (dec.), nos. - EGMR, 22.10.2002 - 57984/00
ANDRASIK AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 66399/09
57984/00, 60237/00, 60242/00, 60679/00, 60680/00, 68563/01 and 60226/00, ECHR 2002-IX; and Charzynski v. Poland (dec.), no. 15212/03, § 40, ECHR 2005-V). - EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 15212/03
CHARZYNSKI c. POLOGNE