Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 24.01.2017 - 47986/11 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2017,14693) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
GROZA v. ROMANIA
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 08.01.2013 - 37576/05
S.C. RAISA M. SHIPPING S.R.L. c. ROUMANIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.01.2017 - 47986/11
The relevant domestic law in force at the time on the service of judicial documents by public notice is summed up in S.C. Raisa M. Shipping S.R.L. v. Romania (no. 37576/05, § 18, 8 January 2013).The Court observes that in the case of S.C. Raisa M. Shipping S.R.L. v. Romania (no. 37576/05, § 25, 8 January 2013) it found that the extraordinary appeal mechanism constituted an effective remedy for a situation similar to that of the present case (see also Hilote v. Romania (dec.), no. 15838/06, § 11, 13 September 2016).
- EGMR, 12.10.2010 - 30767/05
MARIA ATANASIU ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.01.2017 - 47986/11
The applicant challenged an administrative decision issued by local boards of Tîrgu Jiu and Gorj established to deal with requests for the return of confiscated property (see Maria Atanasiu and Others v. Romania, nos. 30767/05 and 33800/06, §§ 44-80, 12 October 2010). - EGMR, 13.09.2016 - 15838/06
HILOTE v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.01.2017 - 47986/11
The Court observes that in the case of S.C. Raisa M. Shipping S.R.L. v. Romania (no. 37576/05, § 25, 8 January 2013) it found that the extraordinary appeal mechanism constituted an effective remedy for a situation similar to that of the present case (see also Hilote v. Romania (dec.), no. 15838/06, § 11, 13 September 2016).