Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 24.01.2017 - 9542/11   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2017,14690
EGMR, 24.01.2017 - 9542/11 (https://dejure.org/2017,14690)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 24.01.2017 - 9542/11 (https://dejure.org/2017,14690)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 24. Januar 2017 - 9542/11 (https://dejure.org/2017,14690)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2017,14690) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (12)

  • EGMR, 06.09.2001 - 69789/01

    BRUSCO v. ITALY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.01.2017 - 9542/11
    Furthermore, the assessment of whether domestic remedies have been exhausted is normally carried out with reference to the date on which the application was lodged with the Court (see, for example, Brusco v. Italy (dec.), no. 69789/01, ECHR 2001-IX, and Andrei Georgiev v. Bulgaria, no. 61507/00, § 78, 26 July 2007).
  • EGMR, 02.10.2003 - 13596/02

    ISAKSEN v. NORWAY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.01.2017 - 9542/11
    Thus, the applicant's trial and conviction for this tax offence do not disclose any failure to comply with the requirements of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 (see Isaksen v. Norway (dec.), no. 13596/02, 2 December 2003; Pirttimäki v. Finland, no. 35232/11, §§ 49-52, 20 May 2014; Larsson v. Sweden (dec.), no. 64102/10, 13 January 2015; and Heinanen v. Finland (dec.), no. 947/13, 6 January 2015).
  • EGMR, 26.07.2007 - 61507/00

    ANDREI GEORGIEV v. BULGARIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.01.2017 - 9542/11
    Furthermore, the assessment of whether domestic remedies have been exhausted is normally carried out with reference to the date on which the application was lodged with the Court (see, for example, Brusco v. Italy (dec.), no. 69789/01, ECHR 2001-IX, and Andrei Georgiev v. Bulgaria, no. 61507/00, § 78, 26 July 2007).
  • EGMR, 12.04.2012 - 60437/08

    ERIKSSON v. SWEDEN

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.01.2017 - 9542/11
    Consequently, the Court has found that potential applicants may, as a general rule, be expected to lodge a domestic claim to seek compensation for alleged breaches of the Convention before applying to the Court (see Eriksson v. Sweden, no. 60437/08, §§ 50-52, 12 April 2012; Ruminski, §§ 37 and 39, cited above; and Marinkovic, §§ 39 and 41, cited above).
  • EGMR, 21.05.2013 - 10404/10

    RUMINSKI v. SWEDEN

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.01.2017 - 9542/11
    Furthermore, a comprehensive summary of the issue of compensation for violations of the Convention in the Swedish legal order can be found in Ruminski v. Sweden ([dec.], no. 10404/10, §§ 14-28, 21 May 2013, Marinkovic v. Sweden ([dec.], no. 43570/10, §§ 18-26, 10 December 2013) and Johansson-Prakt and Salehzade v. Sweden ([dec.], no. 8610/11, §§ 49-60, 16 December 2014).
  • EGMR, 15.10.2013 - 66365/09

    SAVICKAS AND OTHERS v. LITHUANIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.01.2017 - 9542/11
    Consequently, there was an effective remedy available in Sweden when the applicant lodged the present application on 17 September 2010, nine months after the Supreme Court's judgment (see Savickas and Others v. Lithuania (dec.), no. 66365/09 et al., § 86, 15 October 2013).
  • EGMR, 20.05.2014 - 35232/11

    PIRTTIMÄKI v. FINLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.01.2017 - 9542/11
    Thus, the applicant's trial and conviction for this tax offence do not disclose any failure to comply with the requirements of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 (see Isaksen v. Norway (dec.), no. 13596/02, 2 December 2003; Pirttimäki v. Finland, no. 35232/11, §§ 49-52, 20 May 2014; Larsson v. Sweden (dec.), no. 64102/10, 13 January 2015; and Heinanen v. Finland (dec.), no. 947/13, 6 January 2015).
  • EGMR, 10.12.2013 - 43570/10

    MARINKOVIC v. SWEDEN

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.01.2017 - 9542/11
    Furthermore, a comprehensive summary of the issue of compensation for violations of the Convention in the Swedish legal order can be found in Ruminski v. Sweden ([dec.], no. 10404/10, §§ 14-28, 21 May 2013, Marinkovic v. Sweden ([dec.], no. 43570/10, §§ 18-26, 10 December 2013) and Johansson-Prakt and Salehzade v. Sweden ([dec.], no. 8610/11, §§ 49-60, 16 December 2014).
  • EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 8610/11

    S.J.P. AND E.S. v. SWEDEN

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.01.2017 - 9542/11
    Furthermore, a comprehensive summary of the issue of compensation for violations of the Convention in the Swedish legal order can be found in Ruminski v. Sweden ([dec.], no. 10404/10, §§ 14-28, 21 May 2013, Marinkovic v. Sweden ([dec.], no. 43570/10, §§ 18-26, 10 December 2013) and Johansson-Prakt and Salehzade v. Sweden ([dec.], no. 8610/11, §§ 49-60, 16 December 2014).
  • EGMR, 06.01.2015 - 947/13

    HEINANEN v. FINLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.01.2017 - 9542/11
    Thus, the applicant's trial and conviction for this tax offence do not disclose any failure to comply with the requirements of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 (see Isaksen v. Norway (dec.), no. 13596/02, 2 December 2003; Pirttimäki v. Finland, no. 35232/11, §§ 49-52, 20 May 2014; Larsson v. Sweden (dec.), no. 64102/10, 13 January 2015; and Heinanen v. Finland (dec.), no. 947/13, 6 January 2015).
  • EGMR, 13.01.2015 - 64102/10

    LARSSON v. SWEDEN

  • EGMR, 07.06.2016 - 7356/10

    LUCKY DEV CONTRE LA SUÈDE

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht