Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 34983/02   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2005,55022
EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 34983/02 (https://dejure.org/2005,55022)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 24.02.2005 - 34983/02 (https://dejure.org/2005,55022)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 24. Februar 2005 - 34983/02 (https://dejure.org/2005,55022)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2005,55022) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    NOWICKY v. AUSTRIA

    Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
    Violation of Art. 6-1 with regard to the length of the proceedings Inadmissible under Art. 6-1 with regard to access to court Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Costs and expenses partial award - domestic proceedings Costs and expenses (Convention proceedings) - ...

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (11)

  • EGMR, 28.02.2002 - 43956/98

    SAN JUAN contre la FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 34983/02
    In support of this argument they argued that according to the Court's case-law (Van Marle and Others v. the Netherlands, judgment of 26 June 1986, Series A no. 101; San Juan v. France (dec.), no. 43956/98, ECHR 2002-III; Eisenberg v. France (dec.), no. 52237/99, 2 September 2003), proceedings for admission to a profession were not covered by Article 6 where they in essence concerned an assessment of the knowledge and experience required for carrying on the profession.
  • EGMR, 02.09.2003 - 52237/99

    EISENBERG contre la FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 34983/02
    In support of this argument they argued that according to the Court's case-law (Van Marle and Others v. the Netherlands, judgment of 26 June 1986, Series A no. 101; San Juan v. France (dec.), no. 43956/98, ECHR 2002-III; Eisenberg v. France (dec.), no. 52237/99, 2 September 2003), proceedings for admission to a profession were not covered by Article 6 where they in essence concerned an assessment of the knowledge and experience required for carrying on the profession.
  • EGMR, 08.07.2004 - 20077/02

    WOHLMEYER BAU GMBH v. AUSTRIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 34983/02
    In the Court's view, a detailed examination as to whether the applicant could have made more efficient use of the remedy by using it at other stages of the proceedings, would overstretch the duties incumbent on an applicant pursuant to Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (see, Wohlmeyer Bau GmbH v. Austria, no. 20077/02, § 45, 8 July 2004).
  • EGMR, 28.06.1978 - 6232/73

    König ./. Deutschland

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 34983/02
    In comparable cases the Court found that the public law aspects inherent in such systems did not alter the private character of the requested activities (see, among others, König v. Germany, judgment of 28 June 1978, Series A no. 27, pp 29-33, §§ 86-89 concerning a medical practitioner's activity; Benthem v. the Netherlands, judgement of 23 October 1985, Series A no. 97, pp. 14-16, §§ 32-36, relating to the a request for a licence for an installation for the delivery of liquid petroleum).
  • EGMR, 28.06.1990 - 11761/85

    Obermeier ./. Österreich

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 34983/02
    In the sphere of cases falling under the civil head of Article 6 the Court has occasionally answered this question in the negative (Obermeier v. Austria, judgment of 28 June 1990, Series A no. 179, p. 23, § 70).
  • EGMR, 21.09.1993 - 12235/86

    ZUMTOBEL v. AUSTRIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 34983/02
    In other cases it has answered this question in the affirmative (see for instance, Zumtobel v. Austria, judgment of 21 September 1993, Series A no. 268-A, pp. 13-14, §§ 31-32; Fischer v. Austria, judgment of 26 April 1995, Series A no. 312, p. 18, § 34).
  • EGMR, 26.06.1986 - 8543/79

    VAN MARLE AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 34983/02
    In support of this argument they argued that according to the Court's case-law (Van Marle and Others v. the Netherlands, judgment of 26 June 1986, Series A no. 101; San Juan v. France (dec.), no. 43956/98, ECHR 2002-III; Eisenberg v. France (dec.), no. 52237/99, 2 September 2003), proceedings for admission to a profession were not covered by Article 6 where they in essence concerned an assessment of the knowledge and experience required for carrying on the profession.
  • EGMR, 23.10.1985 - 8848/80

    BENTHEM v. THE NETHERLANDS

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 34983/02
    In comparable cases the Court found that the public law aspects inherent in such systems did not alter the private character of the requested activities (see, among others, König v. Germany, judgment of 28 June 1978, Series A no. 27, pp 29-33, §§ 86-89 concerning a medical practitioner's activity; Benthem v. the Netherlands, judgement of 23 October 1985, Series A no. 97, pp. 14-16, §§ 32-36, relating to the a request for a licence for an installation for the delivery of liquid petroleum).
  • EGMR, 26.04.1995 - 16922/90

    FISCHER c. AUTRICHE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 34983/02
    In other cases it has answered this question in the affirmative (see for instance, Zumtobel v. Austria, judgment of 21 September 1993, Series A no. 268-A, pp. 13-14, §§ 31-32; Fischer v. Austria, judgment of 26 April 1995, Series A no. 312, p. 18, § 34).
  • EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

    FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 34983/02
    The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
  • EGMR, 30.01.2001 - 29800/96

    BASIC c. AUTRICHE

  • EGMR, 11.01.2007 - 20027/02

    Menschenrechte: Überlange Verfahrensdauer eines Zivilrechtsstreits

    In Bezug auf die Verfahren vor Verwaltungsgerichten weist der Gerichtshof erneut darauf hin, dass Artikel 6 Abs. 1 auf Verfahren, die im Wesentlichen die Bewertung von Kenntnissen und Erfahrung in schulischen Prüfungen oder Hochschulprüfungen betreffen, keine Anwendung findet (siehe sinngemäß Van Marle u.a. ../. die Niederlande , Urteil vom 26. Juni 1986, Serie A Band 101, Rdnr. 36; San Juan ./. Frankreich (Entscheidung), Individualbeschwerde Nr. 43956/98, 28. Februar 2002; und Nowicky ./. Österreich , Individualbeschwerde Nr. 34983/02, Rdnr. 34, 24.
  • EGMR, 28.09.2006 - 5989/03

    IVERSEN v. DENMARK

    In such cases, the relevant period starts running as soon as a "dispute" arises (see, among other authorities, König v. Germany, judgment of 28 June 1978, Series A no. 27, pp. 33-34, § 98; Janssen v. Germany, no. 23959/94, § 40, 20 December 2001; Gavrielides v. Cyprus, no. 15940/02, § 38, 1 June 2006; Hellborg v. Sweden, no. 47473/99, § 59, 28 February 2006; Nowicky v. Austria, no. 34983/02, § 47, 24 February 2005; and Morscher v. Austria, no. 54039/00, § 38, 5 February 2004).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht