Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  DLUGOLECKI v. POLAND

  (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 24.02.2009 - 23806/03
• EGMR, 01.04.2015 - 23806/03

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (21)

• EGMR, 20.04.2006 - 47579/99

  RAICHINOV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.02.2009 - 23806/03

  Finally, the Court notes that the criminal proceedings in the present case had their origin in a bill of indictment lodged by the politician himself and not by a public prosecutor (see, a contrario, Raichinov v. Bulgaria, no. 47579/99, § 50, 20 April 2006) and that they resulted in conditional discontinuation of these proceedings.

  This is, of course correct, although it is also correct that, in holding an interference with freedom of expression to have been disproportionate, the Court has frequently placed emphasis on the fact that recourse could have been had to means other than criminal sanctions (see, for example, Lehideux and Isorni v. France, judgment of 23 September 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-VII, §§ 51 and 57; Raichinov v. Bulgaria, no. 47579/99, § 50, 20 April 2006).

• EGMR, 28.09.2000 - 37698/97

  LOPES GOMES DA SILVA c. PORTUGAL

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.02.2009 - 23806/03

  The Court notes that although political invective often spills over into the personal sphere, in the instant case the applicant's critical comment did not concern the private or family life of that politician (see a contrario Lopes Gomes da Silva v. Portugal, no. 37698/97, § 34, ECHR 2000-X, and Kulis, cited above, § 52).
• EGMR, 17.12.2004 - 33348/96

  CUMPANA AND MAZARE v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.02.2009 - 23806/03

  In this connection, the Court recalls that the imposition of a prison sentence for a press offence will be compatible with journalists" freedom of expression as guaranteed by Article 10 only in exceptional circumstances, notably where other fundamental rights have been impaired, as for example, in the case of hate speech or incitement to violence (see CumpÇ?nÇ? and MazÇ?re v. Romania [GC], no. 33348/96, § 115, ECHR 2004-XI).

 
• EGMR, 11.10.2005 - 74232/01

  WEIGT v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.02.2009 - 23806/03

  Moreover, it remained open to the courts to resume the proceedings at any time during the period of his probation should any of the circumstances defined by law so justify (see Dabrowski v. Poland, no. 18235/02, § 36, 19 December 2006, and Weigt v Poland (dec.), 74232/01, 11 October 2005).
• EGMR, 09.01.2007 - 51744/99

  KWIECIEN v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.02.2009 - 23806/03

  This principle applies equally to national and local elections (see Kwiecien v. Poland, no. 51744/99, § 48, ECHR 2007-...).
• EGMR, 22.10.2007 - 21279/02

  LINDON, OTCHAKOVSKY-LAURENS ET JULY c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.02.2009 - 23806/03

  In view of the margin of appreciation left to Contracting States a criminal measure as a response to defamation cannot, as such, be considered disproportionate to the aim pursued (see Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v. France [GC], nos. 21279/02 and 36448/02, § 59, ECHR 2007-..., Radio France and Others v. France, no. 53984/00, § 40, ECHR 2004-II and Rumyana Ivanova v. Bulgaria, no. 36207/03, § 68, 14 February 2008).
• EGMR, 14.02.2008 - 36207/03

  RUMYANA IVANOVA v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.02.2009 - 23806/03

  In view of the margin of appreciation left to Contracting States a criminal measure as a response to defamation cannot, as such, be considered disproportionate to the aim pursued (see Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v. France [GC], nos. 21279/02 and 36448/02, § 59, ECHR 2007-..., Radio France and Others v. France, no. 53984/00, § 40, ECHR 2004-II and Rumyana Ivanova v. Bulgaria, no. 36207/03, § 68, 14 February 2008).
• EGMR, 25.03.1985 - 8734/79

  Barthold ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.02.2009 - 23806/03

  By the same token, it is liable to hamper the press in the performance of its task of purveyor of information and public watchdog (see, mutatis mutandis, Barthold v. Germany, judgment of 25 March 1985, Series A no. 90, p. 26, § 58, and Lingens v. Austria, cited above, p. 27, § 44).
• EGMR, 02.03.1987 - 9267/81

  MATHIEU-MOHIN ET CLERFAYT c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.02.2009 - 23806/03

  Free elections and freedom of expression, particularly freedom of political debate, together form the bedrock of any democratic system (see Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v. Belgium, judgment of 2 March 1987, Series A no. 113, p. 22, § 47).
• EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 26682/95

  SÜREK c. TURQUIE (N° 1)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.02.2009 - 23806/03

  There is little scope under Article 10 § 2 of the Convention for restrictions on political speech or on debate on questions of public interest (see Sürek v. Turkey (no. 1) [GC], no. 26682/95, § 61, ECHR 1999-IV).
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …
• EGMR, 25.11.1999 - 23118/93

  NILSEN AND JOHNSEN v. NORWAY
• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …
• EGMR, 11.09.2002 - 57220/00

  MIFSUD contre la FRANCE
• EGMR, 13.11.2003 - 39394/98

  SCHARSACH ET NEWS VERLAGSGESELLSCHAFT c. AUTRICHE
• EGMR, 03.10.2006 - 62414/00

  PALUSINSKI c. POLOGNE
• EGMR, 18.03.2008 - 15601/02

  KULIS v. POLAND
• EGMR, 23.05.1991 - 11662/85

  Oberschlick ./. Österreich
• EGMR, 23.04.1992 - 11798/85

  CASTELLS v. SPAIN
• EGMR, 26.09.1995 - 17851/91

  Radikalenerlaß
• EGMR, 26.11.1991 - 13585/88

  OBSERVER ET GUARDIAN c. ROYAUME-UNI