Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 24.02.2009 - 3052/04 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2009,60893) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
DACIA S.R.L. v. MOLDOVA
Art. 41 MRK
Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 18.03.2008 - 3052/04
- EGMR, 24.02.2009 - 3052/04
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 20.04.2004 - 60115/00
Meinungsfreiheit von Rechtsanwälten bei der öffentlichen Kritik von …
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.02.2009 - 3052/04
The Court reiterates that in order for costs and expenses to be included in an award under Article 41 of the Convention, it must be established that they were actually and necessarily incurred and were reasonable as to quantum (see, for example, Amihalachioaie v. Moldova, no. 60115/00, § 47, ECHR 2004- III). - EGMR, 14.11.2006 - 6923/03
MELNIC v. MOLDOVA
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.02.2009 - 3052/04
Consequently, the reparation should aim at putting the applicant company in the position in which it would have found itself had the violation not occurred, namely had the court action against it been left without examination owing to the expiry of the limitation period and had the applicant company not lost its hotel (see Papamichalopoulos and Others v. Greece (Article 50), 31 October 1995, § 36, Series A no. 330-B; Carbonara and Ventura v. Italy (just satisfaction), no. 24638/94, §§ 37-40, 11 December 2003; Scordino v. Italy (no. 3) (just satisfaction), no. 43662/98, §§ 32-37, ECHR 2007-...; and Melnic v. Moldova, no. 6923/03, § 51, 14 November 2006).