Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 24.02.2011 - 4551/05   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2011,55037
EGMR, 24.02.2011 - 4551/05 (https://dejure.org/2011,55037)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 24.02.2011 - 4551/05 (https://dejure.org/2011,55037)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 24. Februar 2011 - 4551/05 (https://dejure.org/2011,55037)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2011,55037) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

  • EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94

    PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.02.2011 - 4551/05
    The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicants and the relevant authorities (see, among many other authorities, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II).
  • EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

    Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.02.2011 - 4551/05
    The Court reiterates that Article 13 guarantees an effective remedy before a national authority for an alleged breach of the requirement under Article 6 § 1 to hear a case within a reasonable time (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 156, ECHR 2000-XI).
  • EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 43428/02

    MYASHEV c. BULGARIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.02.2011 - 4551/05
    It notes that it has frequently found violations of Article 13 of the Convention in cases raising issues similar to the one in the present case (see, with further references, Myashev v. Bulgaria, no. 43428/02, §§ 22 and 23, 8 January 2009, and Yankov and Manchev, cited above, §§ 32-34).
  • EGMR, 10.12.1982 - 8304/78

    CORIGLIANO v. ITALY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.02.2011 - 4551/05
    Thus, whilst "charge", for the purposes of Article 6 § 1 may in general be defined as "the official notification given to an individual by the competent authority of an allegation that he has committed a criminal offence", it may in some instances take the form of other measures which carry the implication of such an allegation and which likewise substantially affect the situation of the suspect (see among many others, Deweer v. Belgium, 27 February 1980, § 46, Series A no. 35; Eckle v. Germany, 15 July 1982, § 73, Series A no. 51; and Corigliano v. Italy, 10 December 1982, § 34, Series A no. 57).
  • EGMR, 15.07.1982 - 8130/78

    Eckle ./. Deutschland

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.02.2011 - 4551/05
    Thus, whilst "charge", for the purposes of Article 6 § 1 may in general be defined as "the official notification given to an individual by the competent authority of an allegation that he has committed a criminal offence", it may in some instances take the form of other measures which carry the implication of such an allegation and which likewise substantially affect the situation of the suspect (see among many others, Deweer v. Belgium, 27 February 1980, § 46, Series A no. 35; Eckle v. Germany, 15 July 1982, § 73, Series A no. 51; and Corigliano v. Italy, 10 December 1982, § 34, Series A no. 57).
  • EGMR, 27.02.1980 - 6903/75

    DEWEER c. BELGIQUE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.02.2011 - 4551/05
    Thus, whilst "charge", for the purposes of Article 6 § 1 may in general be defined as "the official notification given to an individual by the competent authority of an allegation that he has committed a criminal offence", it may in some instances take the form of other measures which carry the implication of such an allegation and which likewise substantially affect the situation of the suspect (see among many others, Deweer v. Belgium, 27 February 1980, § 46, Series A no. 35; Eckle v. Germany, 15 July 1982, § 73, Series A no. 51; and Corigliano v. Italy, 10 December 1982, § 34, Series A no. 57).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht