Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 24.03.2009 - 2141/03   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2009,58454
EGMR, 24.03.2009 - 2141/03 (https://dejure.org/2009,58454)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 24.03.2009 - 2141/03 (https://dejure.org/2009,58454)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 24. März 2009 - 2141/03 (https://dejure.org/2009,58454)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2009,58454) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

  • EGMR, 22.08.2006 - 7352/03

    BESHIRI AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.03.2009 - 2141/03
    The relevant sections of the Property (Restitution and Compensation) Act have been described in Beshiri and Others v. Albania (no. 7352/03, §§ 21-29, 22 August 2006), Driza v. Albania (no. 33771/02, §§ 36-43, ECHR 2007-... (extracts) and Ramadhi and Others v. Albania (no. 38222/02, §§ 23-30, 13 November 2007).

    The Court reiterates its findings in Balliu v. Albania (dec.), no. 74727/01, 30 September 2004, subsequently confirmed in the Beshiri and Others v. Albania judgment (no. 7352/03, § 32, 22 August 2006), in which it held that a complaint to the Albanian Constitutional Court could be considered an effective remedy which had to be used for the purposes of Article 35 of the Convention where fair-trial issues arose.

  • EGMR, 13.11.2007 - 33771/02

    DRIZA c. ALBANIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.03.2009 - 2141/03
    The relevant sections of the Property (Restitution and Compensation) Act have been described in Beshiri and Others v. Albania (no. 7352/03, §§ 21-29, 22 August 2006), Driza v. Albania (no. 33771/02, §§ 36-43, ECHR 2007-... (extracts) and Ramadhi and Others v. Albania (no. 38222/02, §§ 23-30, 13 November 2007).

    In this connection, it is the State's responsibility to organise the legal system in such a way as to avoid the adoption of discordant judgments in parallel proceedings and to uphold the principle of legal certainty of final judgments, which was impaired by the use of the supervisory review procedure in the instant case (see, in relation to the quashing of a final judgment, Driza v. Albania, no. 33771/02, § 69, ECHR 2007-... (extracts).

  • EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 35382/97

    COMINGERSOLL S.A. v. PORTUGAL

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.03.2009 - 2141/03
    In addition, if one or more heads of damage cannot be calculated precisely or if the distinction between pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage proves difficult, the Court may decide to make a global assessment (see Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, § 29, ECHR 2000-IV).
  • EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

    Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.03.2009 - 2141/03
    Secondly, the Court reiterates that by virtue of Article 1 the primary responsibility for implementing and enforcing the guaranteed rights and freedoms is laid on the national authorities (see Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 152, ECHR 2000-XI).
  • EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 52854/99

    RIABYKH c. RUSSIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.03.2009 - 2141/03
    One of the fundamental aspects of the rule of law is the principle of legal certainty, which requires, among other things, that where the courts have finally determined an issue, their ruling should not be called into question (see Brumarescu v. Romania [GC], no. 28342/95, § 61, ECHR 1999-VII; Ryabykh v. Russia, no. 52854/99, §§ 51-56, ECHR 2003-IX; and Rosca v. Moldova, no. 6267/02, § 24, 22 March 2005).
  • EGMR, 22.03.2005 - 6267/02

    ROSCA v. MOLDOVA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.03.2009 - 2141/03
    One of the fundamental aspects of the rule of law is the principle of legal certainty, which requires, among other things, that where the courts have finally determined an issue, their ruling should not be called into question (see Brumarescu v. Romania [GC], no. 28342/95, § 61, ECHR 1999-VII; Ryabykh v. Russia, no. 52854/99, §§ 51-56, ECHR 2003-IX; and Rosca v. Moldova, no. 6267/02, § 24, 22 March 2005).
  • EGMR, 13.11.2007 - 38222/02

    RAMADHI AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 24.03.2009 - 2141/03
    The relevant sections of the Property (Restitution and Compensation) Act have been described in Beshiri and Others v. Albania (no. 7352/03, §§ 21-29, 22 August 2006), Driza v. Albania (no. 33771/02, §§ 36-43, ECHR 2007-... (extracts) and Ramadhi and Others v. Albania (no. 38222/02, §§ 23-30, 13 November 2007).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht