Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 24.04.2007 - 17122/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,54632) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 10.01.2006 - 17122/02
- EGMR, 24.04.2007 - 17122/02
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 02.07.2002 - 34209/96
S.N. v. SWEDEN
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.04.2007 - 17122/02
Similarly to the case of S.N. v. Sweden (no. 34209/96, ECHR 2002-V) the applicant and counsel had been afforded an opportunity to have questions put to the children during the pre-trial investigation. - EGMR, 26.04.1991 - 12398/86
ASCH v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.04.2007 - 17122/02
Given that the guarantees in paragraph 3 of Article 6 are specific aspects of the right to a fair trial set forth in paragraph 1, it is appropriate to examine the complaint under the two provisions taken together (see Asch v. Austria, judgment of 26 April 1991, Series A no. 203, p. 10, § 25). - EKMR, 15.07.1986 - 9938/82
BRICMONT v. BELGIUM
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.04.2007 - 17122/02
It is normally for the national courts to decide whether it is necessary or advisable to hear a witness (see, among other authorities, Bricmont v. Belgium, judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 158, p. 31, § 89). - EGMR, 14.12.1999 - 37019/97
A.M. v. ITALY
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.04.2007 - 17122/02
As a rule, these rights require that the defendant be given an adequate and proper opportunity to challenge and question a witness against him or her either when the statements were made or at a later stage of the proceedings (see Saïdi v. France, judgment of 20 September 1993, Series A no. 261-C, p. 56, § 43, and A.M. v. Italy, no. 37019/97, § 25, ECHR 1999-IX).